Keep Diversity––Make Standards! Spaces of Standardization for Diversity Analyzed through Cattle Breeding Industry
Abstract
Standardization as spaces of diversity was introduced by Loconto and Demortain (2017) to advance the sociology of standards. Their analytical framework for studying standardization processes in interactive spaces is mobilized and expanded upon in this article in order to address the problematic relationship between standards and diversity. Studying industrialized animals highlights the existing tensions between these opposing forces and the socio-technical attempts to reconcile them. Using a socio-historical approach, we analyze cattle breeding standards as they pass through three interactive spaces of standards: “standards in the making,” “standards in action,” and “standards in circulation.” Drawing from the notion of ecology, we highlight the need for contextualization in order to better understand processes of standardization in a fourth space of “standards in interaction.” The contours of this space are demonstrated through an analysis of the International Bull Evaluation Service (Interbull), which is a space of commensuration for cattle breeding values. Linear interpretations of standardization processes are thus challenged with an empirical demonstration of how standardization can be harnessed to preserve and even enhance diversity.
References
Akrich, M., M. Callon and B. Latour. 2006. Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Paris : Presses des Mines.
Becker, H. S. 2011. Art Worlds. Berkley: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. and L. Waquant.1992. Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowker, G. C. and S. L. Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Brunsson, N., A. Rasche and D. Seidl. 2012. “The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 33(5-6), 613–632.
Busch, L. 2011. Standards. Recipes for Reality. Cambridge: The MIT press.
Callon, M. 1986. “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? edited by J. Law, 196-223. London, Routledge.
Chavinskaia, L., V. Ducrocq and P.-B. Joly. 2017. “Interbull: Constructing International Commensurability for Dairy Cattle Selection.” Interbull Bulletin, 51. https://journal.interbull.org/index.php/ib/article/view/1428/1493
Chavinskaia, L. 2020. “La science fait de la résistance. » Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances” 14-1. Accessed 14 March 2020. http://journals.openedition.org/rac/4262
Desrosières, A. 2014. Prouver et gouverner. Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques. Paris: La Découverte.
Dewey, J. 2011. La formation des valeurs. Paris : La Découverte.
Doganova, L. and B. Laurent. 2016. “Keeping things different: coexistence within European markets for cleantech and biofuels.” Journal of Cultural Economy, 9 (2), 141-156.
Espeland, W. N. and M. L. Stevens. 1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 313-343.
Espeland, W. N. and M. L. Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology, 49: 401-436.
FAO. 2007. “The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.” Commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture, FAO, Rome 2007.
Fligstein, N. and D. McAdam. 2015. The Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press.
Fouilleux, E. 2000. “Entre production et institutionnalisation des idées. La réforme de la politique agricole commune.” Revue française de science politique, 50 (2) : 277-305.
Higgins V. and W. Larner. 2010. “From Standardization to Standardizing Work.” In Calculating the Social, edited by V. Higgins and W. Larner, 205-219. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Interbull Code of Practice. 1994. https://interbull.org/ib/codeofpractice Accessed 13 February 2017.
James, J. W. 1961. “Selection in two environments.” Heredity, 16: 145–152.
Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London and New-York: Routeledge.
Jasanoff, S. 2013 “Epistemic subsidiarity – coexistence, cosmopolitanism, constitutionalism.” European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4 (2):133–141.
Jasiorowski, H. A., M. Stolzman, and Z. Reklewski. 1987. “International FAO Black and White Cattle Strain Comparison (1974-1984).” World Animal Revue, 62: 2-15.
Joly, P.-B. and C. Marris. 2003. “La trajectoire d’un problème public : une approche comparée du cas des OGM en France et aux Etats-Unis.” In Risques collectifs et situations de crise. Apports de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales edited by C. Gilbert, 41-63. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lampland, M. and S. L. Star. 2009. Standards and their stories: how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Latour, B. 2006. “Les ‘Vues’ de l’esprit. Une introduction à l’anthropologie des sciences et des techniques.” In Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs., edited by M. Akrich, M. Callon, and B.
Latour, 33‑69. Paris : Les Presses de Mines.
Loconto, A. M. 2017. “Models of assurance: Diversity and standardization of modes of intermediation.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670 (1): 112-132.
Loconto, A. M. and D. Demortain. 2017. “Standardization as Spaces of Diversity.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 382-392. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.155
Loconto, A. M. and E. Fouilleux. 2014. “Politics of Private Regulation: ISEAL and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance.” Regulation & Governance 8 (2):166–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12028
Powell. W., D. White, K. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith. 2005. “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences.” American Journal of Sociology 110:1132–1205.
Quinn, M. S. 1993. “Corpulent Cattle and Milk Machines: Nature, Art and the Ideal Type.” Society and Animals 1 (2): 145-157.
Rip A. and P.-B. Joly. 2012. “Emerging Spaces and Governance.” A position paper for EU-SPRI.
Russell, N. 1986. Like engend’ring like. Heredity and animal breeding in early modern England. Cambridge University Press.
Schaeffer, L. R., A. Robinson, J. Chesnais, H. Wilmink, G. Wiggans, P.
Rozzi, H. DeBoer, and M. Hunt. 1993. “Multi-trait, across country evaluation of dairy sires.” Interbull Bulletin, No. 8.
Selmi, A. and P.-B. Joly. 2014. “Les régimes de production des connaissances de la sélection animale. Ontologies, mesures, formes de regulation.” Sociologie du Travail, 56: 225-244.
Star S. L. and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science, 19 (3), 387-420.
Star, S. L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research, 7(1): 111-134.
Timmermans, S. and S. Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
Vissac, B. 2002. Les vaches de la République. Saisons et raisons d’un chercheur citoyen. Paris. Inra Editions.
WHFF (World Holstein-Friesian Federation). 2017. “2017 Annual statistic report––World.” http://www.whff.info/documentation/statistics.php#go1
Copyright (c) 2020 Lidia Chavinskaia, Allison Marie Loconto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.
