Chakana and Thirdspace: Engaging Ecuadorian STS in Places of Knowledge Co-Production
Abstract
Ecuadorian STS studies connects to earlier Latin American scholars’ concerns over science and technology. Like many other academic communities, Ecuadorian STS emerged from the collision of scholarly interest, the building of new research centers, and opportunities for collaboration among undergraduate and postgraduate programs. Primarily rooted in the need to develop social technologies these studies form part of a regional movement aimed at questioning: technological dependence, the role of science in peripheral contexts, and public policies of science, technology, and innovation. The ways in which an STS academic community forms around Ecuadorian STS—is in this case, less about a network than—a matter concerning Henri LeFebvre’s “trialectics of spatiality” ([1974] 1991). In particular, Homi Bhabba (1994) and Edward Soja’s (1996) contributions to the decolonial development of a “thirdspace” is understood as a “particular way of thinking about and interpreting socially produced space” (ibid.). This essay offers a reflection on identity (re-)formation in the making of community. Developing a thirdspace as a transformative process draws inspiration from the Chakana, an Andean symbol of wisdom. A specifically decolonial thirdspace unfolds through the three ascending–descending steps of the Chakana that represent both the expansion and the sustaining of the community: 1. as an Andean referencing point (evoking the bridging-staircase symbol); 2. which allows for the co-creation of situated knowledge from different transnational STS genealogies located in Latin America; 3. and as an obligatory point of passage for STS community creation through identity building. Conceptualizing Ecuadorian STS as a thirdspace, helps to socially comprehend community formation as a social process that is also a critique of symbolic space for membership and knowledge production. By discussing why place is fundamental in community institutionalization, this essay creates possibilities to comprehend—dimensions of STS in the Global South—socially, politically, and cognitively.
References
Data Availability
Supplemental data published in this original research article can be accessed in STS Infrastructures at: https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4xs39.
References
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Albornoz, María Belén. 2019a. Chakana STS Logo. Image. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). July 10, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/chakana-sts-logo.
⸻. 2019b. The Beginning. Essay. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). August 29, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/beginning.
⸻. 2020. “Far from Becoming the Jaguar of Latin America: The Ecuadorian Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Turn.” In Assessing the Left Turn in Ecuador, edited by Francisco Sánchez and Simón Pachano, 301-23. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27625-6_13.
Albornoz, María Belén, and Anderson Castro. 2019. First Ecuadorian STS Summer School. Image. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). August 28, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/first-Ecuadorian-sts-summer-school.
Albornoz, María Belén, and Javier Jiménez Becerra. 2012. Estudio Socio-Técnico de la Banda Ancha Como Política de E-Inclusión [Socio-technical study of broadband as an e-Inclusion policy]. Madrid: Editorial Española.
Albornoz, María Belén, Javier Jiménez Becerra, and Jorge Rojas Álvarez. 2017. Ingeniería, Innovación y Tecnología Social [Engineering, innovation and social technology]. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Albornoz, María Belén, and Gaudys L. Sanclemente. 2019. Ecuadorian STS: A Story from the Middle of the World. Essay. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). August 30, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/Ecuadorian-sts-story-middle-world.
Albornoz, María Belén, Gaudys L. Sanclemente, and Anderson Castro. 2019. CTS Lab Ecuador. Essay. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). August 30, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/cts-lab-ecuador.
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, England and New York, NY: Verso.
Ash, Mitchel G. 1983. “The Self-Presentation of a Discipline: History of Psychology in the United States between Pedagogy and Scholarship.” In Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, edited by Loren Graham, Wolf Lepenies, and Peter Weingart, 143–90. Boston, Dordrecht, and Lancaster: D Reidel Publishing Company.
Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. “The Third Space: Interview with Homi Bhabha.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 207–221. London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
⸻. 1994. The Location of Culture. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
Boehmer, Elleke. 2005. Stories of Women: Gender and Narrative in the Postcolonial Nation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Brennan, Timothy. 1989. Salman Rushdie and the Third World: Myths of the Nation. London, England: Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20079-5.
Carson, Ciaran. 2010. Space, Place, Writing. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjcgf.
Chambers, Iain, and Lidia Curti. 1996. The Postcolonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons. London: Routledge.
Chávez, Henry, and Jaqueline Gaybor. 2018. “Science and Technology Internationalization and the Emergence of Peripheral Techno-Dreams: The Yachay Project Case.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 238-255.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1523522.
Dagnino, Renato. 2008. Neutralidade da Ciência y Determinismo Tecnológico [Neutrality of Science and Technological Determinism]. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
⸻. 2010. Tecnologia Social: Ferramenta para Construir Outra Sociedade [Social Technology. Tools to Build Another Society]. Campinas: Editorial Komedi.
Dagnino, Renato, and Hernán Thomas. 1999a. “Existe la Política Científica y Tecnológica en América Latina: Nuevos Escenarios y el Papel de la Comunidad de Investigación” [There is a scientific and technological policy in Latin America: New scenarios and the role of the research community]. Redes 6(13): 49–74.
⸻. 1999b. “La Política Científica y Tecnológica en América Latina: Nuevos Escenarios y el Papel de la Comunidad de Investigación.” Redes 6(13): 49–74.
Dagnino, Renato, Hernán Thomas, and Amílcar Davyt. 1996. “El Pensamiento en Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad en Latinoamérica: Una Interpretación Política de su Trayectoria” [Thought in science, technology and society in Latin America: A political interpretation of its trajectory]. Redes 3(7): 13-51.
During, Simon. 2000. “Postcolonialism and Globalization: Towards a Historicization of their Inter-Relation.” Cultural Studies 14(3–4): 385–404.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380050130392.
Geuter, Ulfried. 1983. “The Uses of History for the Shaping of a Field: Observations on German Psychology.” In Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, edited by Loren Graham, Wolf Lepenies, and Peter Weingart, 191–228. Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gikandi, Simon. 1996. Maps of Englishness: Writing Identity in the Culture of Colonialism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gómez-Urrego, and José David. 2019. “The Intersections Between Infrastructures and Expectations: Repair and Breakdown in Yachay, the City of Knowledge in Ecuador” [As interseções entre infraestruturas e expectativas: Reparo e colapso em Yachay, a cidade do conhecimento no Equador]. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 2(1): 495–539.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2019.1649963.
Hass, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46(1): 1-35.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706951.
Hay, Collin. 2002. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62911-0.
Heidegger, Martin. [1927] 1962. Being and Time [Sein und Zeit]. New York: Harper & Row.
Kreimer, Pablo, and Hebe Vessuri. 2018. “Latin American Science, Technology, and Society: A Historical and Reflexive Approach.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 17–37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lefebvre, Henri. [1974] 1991. The Production of Space [La Production de l’Espace]. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, England and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Lepenies, Wolf, and Peter Weingart. 1983. “Introduction.” In Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, edited by Loren Graham, Wolf Lepenies, and Peter Weingart. Dordrecht, Boston, and Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Mayanza, Luis, and Abrahan Mora. 2022. “Andean Chakana Wisdom and Its Colors: A Didactic Tool for Bilingual Intercultural Education.” Diálogo Andino (67): 99–111.
http://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-26812022000100099.
Meskell-Brocken, Steph. 2020. “First, Second and Third: Exploring Soja’s Thirdspace Theory in Relation to Everyday Arts and Culture for Young People.” In Developing a Sense of Place, Tamara Ashley and Alexis Weedon, edited by Tamara Ashley and Alexis Weedon. Los Angeles: UCL Press.
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.
Norton, Bonny. 2000. Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Núñez, Jorge, and Maka Suárez. 2021. “A ‘Middle Voice’ from the South: A Response to Sharon Traweek’s 2020 Bernal Lecture.” Engaging Science, Technology & Society 7(2): 81-87.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.815.
Pavlenko, Aneta, and Bonny Norton. 2007. “Imagined Communities, Identity, and English Language Learning.” In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, Jim Cummins and Chris Davison, 669–80. Boston, MA: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_43.
Pratt, Mary Louise. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London, England: Routledge.
Puma Uguña, Nelly A. 2014. “Ramillete de Caminos: El Estudio de la Chakana y su Influencia en Construcción de las Expresiones Artísticas Corporales Contemporáneas en la Primera Década del Siglo XXI en Cuenca” [Ramillete de caminos: The study of the Chakana and its influence in the construction of contemporary corporal artistic expressions in the first decade of the XXI century in Cuenca]. Cuenca: Universidad de Cuenca. Accessed August 8, 2023.
http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/5481.
Rowe, Nicholas. 1997. Rules and Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Saïd, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986. “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions.” In Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg, 51–81.. New York: Agathon.
Soja, Edward W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Suárez, Maka, and Jorge Núñez. 2019. About Kaleidos: A Center for Interdisciplinary Ethnography. Essay. Distributed by STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). August 29, 2019. August 9, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/about-kaleidos-center-interdisciplinary-ethnography.
Thomas, Hernán, María Belén Albornoz, and Facundo Picabea, eds. 2015. Políticas Tecnológicas y Tecnologías Políticas: Dinámicas de Inclusión, Desarrollo e Innovación en América Latina [Technological policies and political technologies: Dynamics of inclusion, development and innovation in Latin America]. Quito and Quilmes: FLACSO Ecuador-Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Thomas, Hernán, and Mariano Fressoli. 2007. “Repensar las Tecnologías Sociales: De las Tecnologías Apropiadas a la Adecuación Socio-Técnica” [Rethinking social technologies: From appropriate technologies to socio-technical adequacy]. Congreso Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Ciencias Sociales, 50 Aniversario FLACSO.
⸻. 2009. “En Búsqueda de una Metodología para Investigar Tecnologías Sociales” [In search of a methodology to research social technologies]. In Tecnología Social: Ferramenta para Construir Outra Sociedade [Social technology: Tools to build another society], edited by Renato Dagnino, 113–137. Campinas: Editora Kaco.
Varsavsky, Oscar. 1969. Ciencia, Política y Cientificismo [Science, politics and scientism]. Buenos Aires: Editorial de la Universidad de Quilmes.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Raymond. 1975. The Country and the City. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Windle, Amanda. 2023. “Multiple Three-Step Chakana Figurations.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental, Collaborative Ethnography). August 22, 2023. Accessed August 24, 2023.
Copyright (c) 2021 Belén Albornoz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.
