What Fragility? Multiple Professional Visions in the Maintenance of French Public Roads
Abstract
A growing body of work in STS has highlighted the ambiguousness of infrastructure maintenance, as an activity that contributes to reproducing sociomaterial order while bringing to light its very fragility. The case of local public roads in France is instructive in this respect: for about a decade, a variety of public and private actors have been raising concerns about the fragility of this abundant infrastructure, questioning the organization of knowledge production for its maintenance after the withdrawal of centralized state engineering. This article draws on a multi-sited inquiry to extract three ethnographic vignettes that suggest the coexistence of multiple knowledges in road maintenance, oriented toward contrasted forms of fragility. I analyze these knowledges as professional visions (Goodwin 1994), associated with different notions of the most relevant expertise to make infrastructures last. The coexistence of multiple visions of infrastructural fragilities thus gives rise to new uncertainties: as the case may be, these visions might either contribute to a stabilized division of labor, or challenge existing institutional frameworks. These remarks invite us to systematically question the plurality of modes of knowing that organize infrastructure maintenance, in order to further widen the analysis of the complex relationships between material and organizational fragilities.
References
AdCF (Assemblée des communautés de France—Association of French Federations of Municipalities). 2015. Création de l’Observatoire National de la Route [Creation of the National Road Observatory]. Press release. Accessed February 23, 2024.
https://www.routesdefrance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/cp-26-janvier-2015.pdf.
Barjot, Dominique. 2006. La Grande Entreprise Française de Travaux Publics (1883-1974) [The Great French Public Works Company (1883-1974)]. Paris: Economica.
Barnes, Jessica. 2017. “States of Maintenance: Power, Politics, and Egypt’s Irrigation Infrastructure.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35(1): 146–64.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816655161.
Barry, Andrew. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
⸻. 2020. “The Material Politics of Infrastructure.” In TechnoScienceSociety: Technological Reconfigurations of Science and Society, edited by Sabine Maasen, Sascha Dickel, and Christoph Schneider, 91–109. Cham: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43965-1_6.
Boyer, Dominic. 2018. “Infrastructure, Potential Energy, Revolution.” In The Promise of Infrastructure, edited by Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel, 223–43. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bulkeley, Harriet, Matt Watson, and Ray Hudson. 2007. “Modes of Governing Municipal Waste.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39(11): 2733–53.
https://doi.org/10.1068/a38269.
Callén, Blanca, and Tomás Sánchez Criado. 2015. “Vulnerability Tests: Matters of ‘Care for Matter’ in E-Waste Practices.” Tecnoscienza 6(2): 17–40.
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17252.
Cerema. 2020. Programme National: Ponts [National Program: Bridges]. Press pack. Published December 17, 2020. Accessed September 2, 2022.
https://www.cerema.fr/system/files/documents/2020/12/programmenationalponts_0.pdf.
Chatzis, Konstantinos. 2008. “Rationalizing Maintenance Activities within French Industry during the Trente Glorieuses (1945–75).” Journal of History of Science and Technology 2: 75–138.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt. 2019. “Keeping Software Present: Software as a Timely Object for STS Studies of the Digital.” In DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, edited by Janet Vertesi and David Ribes, 423–46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cour des Comptes. 2022. L’Entretien des Routes Nationales et Départementales [Maintenance of National and Departmental Roads]. Public report, March 10, 2022. Accessed August 24, 2022.
https://www.ccomptes.fr/fr/publications/lentretien-des-routes-nationales-et-departementales.
Dant, Tim. 2010. “The Work of Repair: Gesture, Emotion and Sensual Knowledge.” Sociological Research Online 15(3): 97–118.
https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2158.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. [2007] 2010. Objectivity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Denis, Jérôme. 2018. “The Maintenance of What? The Contrasted Ontologies of Objects that Last.” Paper Presentation in Artisanal Electronics—Digital Culture of Repair Conference Geneva, Switzerland, July 6, 2018. Accessed February 17, 2024.
https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01841468/document.
Denis, Jérôme, and Daniel Florentin. forthcoming. “Urban Infrastructures’ Maturity and the Age(s) of Maintenance.” In Handbook of Infrastructures and Cities, edited by Olivier Coutard and Daniel Florentin. London: Edward Elgar.
Denis, Jérôme, and David Pontille. 2015. “Material Ordering and the Care of Things.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40(3): 338–67.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129.
⸻. 2017. “Beyond Breakdown: Exploring Regimes of Maintenance.” Continent 6(1): 13–17.
⸻. 2020a. “Maintenance et Attention à la Fragilité” [Maintenance and Attention to Fragility]. SociologieS (Online), May 20, 2020. Accessed March 30, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologies.13936.
⸻. 2020b. “Why Do Maintenance and Repair Matter?” In The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, edited by Anders Blok, Ignacio Farías, and Celia Roberts, 283–93. Oxon, New York: Routledge.
⸻. 2021. “Maintenance Epistemology and Public Order: Removing Graffiti in Paris.” Social Studies of Science 51(2): 233–258.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720956720.
Domínguez Rubio, Fernando. 2014. “Preserving the Unpreservable: Docile and Unruly Objects at MoMA.” Theory and Society 43: 617–45.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9233-4.
⸻. 2016. “On the Discrepancy between Objects and Things: An Ecological Approach.” Journal of Material Culture 21(1): 59–86.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183515624128.
Dupuy, Claire, and Julie Pollard. 2014. “A Dethroned King? The Limits of State Infrastructural Power in France.” Public Administration 92(2): 359–74.
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12057.
Edensor, Tim. 2011. “Entangled Agencies, Material Networks and Repair in a Building Assemblage: The Mutable Stone of St Ann’s Church, Manchester.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36(2): 238–52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00421.x.
⸻. 2013. “Vital Urban Materiality and Its Multiple Absences: The Building Stone of Central Manchester.” Cultural Geographies 20(4): 447–65.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474012438823.
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. “Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm.” In Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, translated by John Tedeschi and Anne C. Tedeschi, 96–125. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–33.
https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
Graham, Stephen. 2010. “Introduction: When Infrastructure Fails.” In Disrupted Cities, edited by Stephen Graham, 1–26. London, England: Routledge.
Graham, Stephen, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance.” Theory, Culture & Society 24(3): 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954.
Gregson, Nicky, Alan Metcalfe, and Louise Crewe. 2009. “Practices of Object Maintenance and Repair: How Consumers Attend to Consumer Objects within the Home.” Journal of Consumer Culture 9(2): 248–72.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509104376.
Guldi, Jo. 2012. Roads to Power: Britain Invents the Infrastructure State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guy, Simon, Simon Marvin, Will Medd, and Timothy Moss, eds. 2011. Shaping Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-Technical Networks. London, England: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
Harvey, Penelope. 2012. “The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach.” Theory, Culture & Society 29(4–5): 76–92.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827.
Henke, Christopher R. 2000. “The Mechanics of Workplace Order: Toward a Sociology of Repair.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44: 55–81.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035546.
Henke, Christopher R., and Benjamin Sims. 2020. Repairing Infrastructures: The Maintenance of Materiality and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11771.001.0001.
Hommels, Anique. 2005. “Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 30(3): 323–51.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271759.
Houston, Lara, and Steven J. Jackson. 2016. “Caring for the ‘Next Billion’ Mobile Handsets: Opening Proprietary Closures through the Work of Repair.” In Proceedings of the ACM Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (10): 1–11. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909658.
Institut des Routes, des Rues et des Infrastructures pour la Mobilité (IDRRIM). 2014. Entretenir et Préserver le Patrimoine d’Infrastructures de Transport : Une Exigence pour la France [Maintaining and preserving the transport infrastructure heritage: A requirement for France]. White paper. Paris: IDRRIM. Accessed October 6, 2021.
https://www.idrrim.com/ressources/documents/5/2776,Livret-A5-28pages-IDRRIM-BD-0914.pdf.
⸻. 2016. “GEPUR : Gestion et Entretien du Patrimoine Urbain et Routier—Méthodes, Outils et Techniques. Volet n°1 : Routes Interurbaines et Traverses d’Agglomérations” [Management and Maintenance of Urban and Road Heritage—Methods, Tools and Techniques. Section n°1: Interurban Roads and Urban Crossings]. Management and Upkeep Guide for the Attention of Road Network Managers. Paris: IDRRIM. Accessed March 24, 2021.
https://www.idrrim.com/ressources/documents/8/4426-04.07.16-Guide-GEPUR.pdf.
⸻. 2021. Rapport Observatoire National de la Route 2021 [2021 Report of the National Road Observatory]. Paris: IDRRIM. Accessed December 16, 2021.
https://www.idrrim.com/ressources/documents/12/9164-IDRRIM_Rapport_ONR-2021.pdf.
⸻. 2022. Guide pour l’Audit et le Diagnostic d’un Patrimoine d’Infrastructures Routières [Guide for the Audit and Diagnosis of a Road Infrastructure Asset]. Paris: IDRRIM. Accessed December 8, 2022.
https://www.idrrim.com/publications/9628.htm.
Jackson, Steven J., Alex Pompe, and Gabriel Krieshok. 2012. “Repair Worlds: Maintenance, Repair, and ICT for Development in Rural Namibia.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 107–16. CSCW ’12. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145224.
Jones, Siân, and Thomas Yarrow. 2013. “Crafting Authenticity: An Ethnography of Conservation Practice.” Journal of Material Culture 18(1): 3–26.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512474383.
Kaika, Maria, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2000. “Fetishizing the Modern City: The Phantasmagoria of Urban Technological Networks.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (IJURR) 24(1): 120–38.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00239.
Lakoff, Andrew, and Stephen J. Collier. 2010. “Infrastructure and Event: The Political Technology of Preparedness.” In Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, edited by Bruce Braun and Sarah J. Whatmore, 243–66. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42(1): 327–43.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.
Law, John. 2016. “Modes of Knowing: Resources from the Baroque.” In Modes of Knowing: Resources from the Baroque, edited by John Law and Evelyn Ruppert, 17–56. Manchester: Mattering Press.
http://doi.org/10.28938/9780993144981.
Lemanski, Charlotte. 2020. “Infrastructural Citizenship: The Everyday Citizenships of Adapting and/or Destroying Public Infrastructure in Cape Town, South Africa.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45(3): 589–605.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12370.
Mains, Daniel. 2012. “Blackouts and Progress: Privatization, Infrastructure, and a Developmentalist State in Jimma, Ethiopia.” Cultural Anthropology 27(1): 3–27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01124.x.
Moss, Timothy. 2016. “Conserving Water and Preserving Infrastructures between Dictatorship and Democracy in Berlin.” Water Alternatives 9(2): 250–71.
Orr, Julian E. 1996. Talking about Machines. An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pontille, David. 2009. “Écriture et Action Juridique: Portrait de l’Huissier de Justice en Réparateur” [Writing and Legal Action: Portrait of the Bailiff as a Repairer]. Semen 28: 15–31.
https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.8688.
Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in more than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rabeharisoa, Vololona, and Florence Paterson. 2024. “Non-Manipulable Things? Maintaining a Techno-Judicial Imaginary on Sealed Biological Samples in the French Criminal Justice.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(3): 144–164.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1329.
Rapoport, Jacques, Amaury Decludt, Bruno Acar, Justin Babilotte, et al. 2017. “Revue de Dépenses: Voirie des Collectivités Territoriales” [Expenditure Review of Roads of Territorial Authorities]. Paris: Inspection Générale des Finances, Inspection Générale de l’Administration, Conseil Général de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable. Accessed January 4, 2022.
https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/content/download/106213/842069/file/17033R-voirie-collterr-web.pdf.
Rest, Matthäus, and Alessandro Rippa. 2019. “Road Animism: Reflections on the Life of Infrastructures.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9(2): 373–89.
https://doi.org/10.1086/706041.
Rosner, Daniela K., and Morgan Ames. 2014. “Designing for Repair? Infrastructures and Materialities of Breakdown.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 319–31. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531692.
Routes de France. 2018. Routes et Rues, l’Urgence: Rénover, Entretenir [Roads and Streets, the Emergency: Renovate, Maintain]. Accessed March 30, 2020.
Sanne, Johan M. 2010. “Making Matters Speak in Railway Maintenance.” In Ethnographies of Diagnostic Work: Dimensions of Transformative Practice, edited by Monika Büscher, Dawn Goodwin, and Jessica Mesman, 54–72. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230296930_4.
Silvast, Antti, and Mikko J. Virtanen. 2019. “An Assemblage of Framings and Tamings: Multi-Sited Analysis of Infrastructures as a Methodology.” Journal of Cultural Economy 12(6): 461–77.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1646156.
Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” The Sociological Review 38(1): 26–56.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03347.x.
Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7(1): 111–34.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
Star, Susan Leigh, and Anselm Strauss. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8(1): 9–30.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359.
Tironi, Manuel, and Nerea Calvillo. 2016. “Water and Air: Territories, Tactics, and the Elemental Textility of Urban Cosmopolitics.” In Urban Cosmopolitics: Agencements, Assemblies, Atmospheres, edited by Anders Blok and Ignacio Farías, 207–24. London, England: Routledge.
Ureta, Sebastián. 2014. “Normalizing Transantiago: On the Challenges (and Limits) of Repairing Infrastructures.” Social Studies of Science 44(3): 368–92.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714523855.
Winner, Langdon. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109(1): 121–36.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652.
Yurchak, Alexei. 2015. “Bodies of Lenin: The Hidden Science of Communist Sovereignty.” Representations 129(1): 116–57.
Copyright (c) 2024 Roman Solé-Pomies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.
