Stewards of the Organization: The Management of Repair and Maintenance Work in Large Organizations

  • Alex Reiss Sorokin

Abstract

Studies of repair and maintenance work have pointed to a gap between the way repair and maintenance work is prescribed and the way it is done in practice. This article seeks to contribute an empirical and conceptual account of what transpires in this gap. It focuses on repair and maintenance team supervisors who are both trained repair workers and managers. The article argues that supervisors use their knowledge of the organization alongside their knowledge of materials, people, and objects. To do their work, they articulate and negotiate competing interests and values, drawing on their experience as repair workers and on their managerial autonomy. In developing the concept of “working knowledge,” existing studies have tended to focus on the triangular relationship between customers, repair workers, and machines. This article contributes another dimension to “working knowledge,” arguing that supervisors and repair workers strive to unpack and interpret, to the best of their ability, not only what constitutes a breakdown or a repair but also what is desirable and beneficial for the organization. By closely tracing three cases in which team supervisors engage in organizational work and interpret managerial preferences, the article shows that repair and maintenance work is shaped not only from below, by interactions with materials, environments, and people, but also from above, by repeated attempts to order, organize, and manage it.

References

Barley, Stephen R., and Julian E. Orr, eds. 1997. “Introduction.” In Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in the United States, 1–20. Ithaca, NY and London, England: Cornell University Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv75d65m.

Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Connolly, William E. 2013. “The ‘New Materialism’ and the Fragility of Things.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(3): 399–412.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813486849.

Cooke, Fang Lee. 2003. “Plant Maintenance Strategy: Evidence from Four British Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 9(3): 239–249.

https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510310493693.

Cooperman, Alissa, John Dieckmann, and James Brodrick. 2012. “Control Systems & LEED.” ASHRAE Journal 54(6): 96–99.

Dant, Tim. 2010. “The Work of Repair: Gesture, Emotion and Sensual Knowledge.” Sociological Research Online 15(3): 97–118.

https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2158.

Dant, Tim, and David Bowles. 2003. “Dealing with Dirt: Servicing and Repairing Cars.” Sociological Research Online 8(2): 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.793.

Denis, Jérôme, and David Pontille. 2010. “Placing Subway Signs: Practical Properties of Signs as Work.” Visual Communication 9(4): 441–462.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210382189.

⸻. 2014. “Maintenance Work and the Performativity of Urban Inscriptions: The Case of Paris Subway Signs.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32(3): 404–416.

https://doi.org/10.1068/d13007p.

⸻. 2015. “Material Order and the Care of Things.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40(3): 338–367.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129.

⸻. 2021. “Maintenance Epistemology and Public Order: Removing Graffiti in Paris.” Social Studies of Science 51(2): 233–258.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720956720.

Denis, Jérôme, Alessandro Mongili, and David Pontille. 2015. “Maintenance & Repair in Science and Technology Studies.” Technoscienza 6(2): 5–15.

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17251.

Dubois, Pierre. 1981. “Workers Control Over the Organization of Work: French and English Maintenance Workers in Mass Production Industry.” Organization Studies 2(4): 347–360.

https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068100200403.

Edgerton, David. 2007. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edwards, Paul N. 2002. “Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time, and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems”. In Modernity and Technology, edited by Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, 185–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4729.003.0011.

Fürst, Moritz F. 2019. “‘A Good Enough Fix’: Repair and Maintenance in Librarians’ Digitization Practice.” In Repair Work Ethnographies: Revisiting Breakdown, Relocating Materiality, edited by Ignaz Strebel, Alain Bovet, and Philippe Sormani, 61–87. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2110-8_3.

Gallimore, Kevin F., and Richard J. Penlesky. 1988. “A Framework for Developing Maintenance Strategies.” Production and Inventory Management Journal 29(1): 16–22.

Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.

Graham, Stephen, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance.” Theory, Culture &Society 24(3): 1–25.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075954.

Grasseni, Cristina. 2004. “Skilled Vision: An Apprenticeship in Breeding Aesthetics.” Social Anthropology 12(1): 41–55.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2004.tb00089.x.

Harper, Douglas A. 1987. Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Henke, Christopher R. 2000. “The Mechanics of Workplace Order: Toward a Sociology of Repair.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44: 55–81.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035546.

⸻. 2017. “The Sustainable University: Repair as Maintenance and Transformation.” Continent 6(1): 40–45.

Henke, Christopher R., and Benjamin Sims. 2020. Repairing Infrastructures: The Maintenance of Materiality and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Houston, Lara. 2019. “Mobile Phone Repair Knowledge in Downtown Kampala: Local and Trans-Local Circulations.” In Repair Work Ethnographies: Revisiting Breakdown, Relocating Materiality, edited by Ignaz Strebel, Alain Bovet, and Philippe Sormani, 129–160. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2110-8_5.

Huising, Ruthanne, and Susan S. Silbey. 2011. “Governing the Gap: Forging Safe Science through Relational Regulation.” Regulation & Governance 5(1): 14–42.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01100.x.

Jackson, Steven J. 2014. “Rethinking Repair.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 221–240. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015.

Jackson, Steven J., Alex Pompe, and Gabriel Krieshok. 2012. “Repair Worlds: Maintenance, Repair, and ICT for Development in Rural Namibia.” Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, 107–116.

https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145224.

Khazraei, Khashayar, and Jochen Deuse. 2011. “A Strategic Standpoint on Maintenance Taxonomy.” Journal of Facilities Management 9(2): 96–113.

https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111128452.

Lejeune, Christophe. 2019. “Interruptions, Lunch Talks, and Support Circles: An Ethnography of Collective Repair in Steam Locomotive Restoration.” In Repair Work Ethnographies: Revisiting Breakdown, Relocating Materiality, edited by Ignaz Strebel, Alain Bovet, and Philippe Sormani, 221–251. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2110-8_8.

Lyneis, John L., and John D. Sterman. 2009. “Green, Simple, and Profitable: The Paradox of Failed Best Practices in University Building Maintenance.” MIT Sloan School of Management. Unpublished manuscript., 1–26. Accessed February 16, 2024.

https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2009/proceed/papers/P1118.pdf.

Moubray, John. 1997. Reliability-Centered Maintenance. New York, NY: Industrial Press Inc.

Murphy, Michelle. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Orlikowski, Wanda J., and JoAnne Yates. 2002. “It’s About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations.” Organization Science 13(6): 684–700.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3086088.

Orr, Julian E. 1996. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Pine, Kathleen H., and Melissa Mazmanian. 2017. “Artful and Contorted Coordinating: The Ramifications of Imposing Formal Logics of Task Jurisdiction on Situated Practice.” Academy of Management Journal 60(2): 720–42.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0315.

Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Reinecke, Juliane, and Shaz Ansari. 2015. “When Times Collide: Temporal Brokerage at the Intersection of Markets and Developments.” The Academy of Management Journal 58(2): 618–648.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/43589377.

Russell, Andrew L., and Lee Vinsel. 2018. “After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance.” Technology and Culture 59(1): 1–25.

https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2018.0004.

Shapin, Steven. 1989. “The Invisible Technician.” American Scientist 77(6): 554–563.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27856006.

Suchman, Lucy, and Libby Bishop. 2000. “Problematizing ‘Innovation’ as a Critical Project.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 3(12): 327–333.

https://doi.org/10.1080/713698477.

Swanson, Laura. 2001. “Linking Maintenance Strategies to Performance.” International Journal of Production Economics 70(3): 237–244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00067-0.

Ureta, Sebastián. 2014. “Normalizing Transantiago: On the Challenges (and Limits) of Repairing Infrastructures.” Social Studies of Science 44(3): 368–392.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714523855.

van Maanen, John, and Stephen R. Barley. 1984. “Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 287–365.

Whalley, Peter, and Stephen R. Barley. 1997. “Technical Work in the Division of Labor: Stalking the Wily Anomaly.” In Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in the United States, edited by Stephen R. Barley and Julian E. Orr, 23–52. Ithaca, NY and London, England: Cornell University Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv75d65m.6.

Zabusky, Stacia E. 1997. “Computers, Clients, and Expertise: Negotiating Technical Identities in a Nontechnical World.” In Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in the United States, 129–153. Ithaca, NY and London, England: Cornell University Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv75d65m.11.

Zabusky, Stacia E., and Stephen R. Barley. 1996. “Redefining Success: Ethnographic Observations on the Careers of Technicians.” In Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New Economy, edited by Paul Osterman, 185–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195093537.003.0007.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Published
22 Apr 2024
Section
Thematic Collections