Dissolving Boundaries in the Policy System

  • Maja Horst


Based on personal experiences with science policy advice, this paper argues that science and technology studies (STS) would benefit from developing closer collaboration and collegial links with innovations studies (IS). When it comes to achieving impact outside our academic circles, disciplinary boundaries do not seem very relevant. Rather, it would be preferential if our contributions were based on systematic interaction with neighbouring fields – and if our relations with those fields were based on strong networks of collaboration.


Data Availability

Data published in this issue can be accessed in STS Infrastructures at: https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4ds3n.


Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–52.


Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Fagerberg, Jan, Ben R. Martin, and Esben Sloth Andersen. 2013. Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Horst, Maja. 2013. “A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists’ Perception of Representing Research in Public Communication.” Science Communication 35(6): 758–79.


Klein, Julie Thompson. 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

Steinmueller, W. Edward. 2013. “Innovation Studies at Maturity.” In Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges, edited by Jan Fagerberg, Ben Martin, and Esben Sloth Andersen, 147–67. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Webster, Andrew. 2007. “Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(4): 458–478.


31 Dec 2023
Thematic Collections