Frugal Ground for STS and IS: Problems of Innovation and their Commonalities

  • Judith Sutz


The fields of “science, technology, and society” and “innovation studies” may come closer together in a frugally-fruitful way by engaging—with their specific tools—in the comprehension of and action upon some innovation problems, particularly those involving inequality.



Arocena, Rodrigo, and Judith Sutz. 2020. “The Need for New Theoretical Conceptualizations on National Systems of Innovation, Based on the Experience of Latin America.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 29(7): 814–829.

Bound, Kirsten, and Ian Thornton. 2012. Our Frugal Future: Lessons from India’s Innovation System. Nesta Report. Accessed November 9, 2021.

Freeman, Christopher. 1992. “Bernal and the Social Function of Science.” In The Economics of Hope. Essays on Technical Change, Economic Growth and the Environment, edited by Christopher Freeman. London: Pinter Publishers. 3–30.

Hess, David. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry. Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Irwin, Alan. 2023. “STS and Innovation: Borderlands, Regenerations and Critical Engagements.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(2): 41–56.

Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lundvall, Bengt Åke. 1985. “Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction.” Industrial Development Research Series 31, Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

Sabato, Jorge, and Natalio Botana. 1968. “La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina” [Science and technology in the future development of Latin America]. Revista de la Integración 3(1): 15–36.

Srinivas, Smita, and Judith Sutz. 2008. “Developing Countries and Innovation. Searching for a New Analytical Approach.” Technology in Society 30(2): 129–140.

31 Dec 2023
Thematic Collections