TRANSnationalizing STS: Places, Spaces, and Politics
Abstract
Why, how, and for whom does it matter to walk through, attend and attune to plural and complex STS places/spaces? By building on the STS Across Borders and Innovating STS exhibits held at 4S 2018 and 2019 meetings, this thematic collection unpacks this question and explores the potentials of TRANSnational STS as a methodological orientation in these uncertain times, in a world where technoscientific knowledges and practices are constantly instrumentalized, reproducing colonial, imperialist, racist, nationalist and toxic relationships. The landscape of analysis in curating this thematic collection begins with the places of STS; this can be either a place where an STS meeting is held, an institution where STS scholars do research and teaching, or a formation that brings people together for social studies of science and technology. We invite readers to slowly walk through such a landscape, observing in detail particular places of STS. The contributors to this thematic collection highlight the importance of thinking and theorizing by starting with lived experiences, investigating each phenomenon within its own reality, and creating and conserving spaces for plurality with responsibility and care. Recognizing that reality is multi-layered, and thus needs a plurality of perspectives, the invitation to think about STS theories and practices through the analytic of place is about opening and holding collaborative spaces for ongoing discussions over the politics of STS without reproducing a form of methodological nationalism. This introductory essay presents what we have learned over the last four years navigating in and through TRANSnational STS places/spaces and constitutes one stop in our journey to slow down, reflect on, and share what it means to TRANSnationalize STS. With this collection, we hope to open a public space in ESTS to continue thinking collectively about potential new pathways for the future of the field.
References
Data Availability
Supplemental data published in this original research article can be accessed in STS Infrastructures at: https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4t01p.
References
Albornoz, Maria Belen. 2023. “Chakana and Thirdspace: Engaging Ecuadorian STS in Places of Knowledge Co-Production.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(1): 63–80.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.1239.
Alkan, Aybike, Duygu Kaşdoğan, and Maral Erol. 2023. “Placing STS in and through Turkey.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(1): 104–124.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1091.
Anderson, Warwick, and Vincanne Adams. 2008. “Pramoedya’s Chickens: Postcolonial Studies of Technoscience.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, Third Edition, 181–207. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1978. The Life of the Mind, edited by Mary McCarthy. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Atienza, Paul Michael Leonardo, and Kathleen Gutierrez. 2021. On the Possibility of Philippine STS: Collaborating toward a Special Issue. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 9, 2021. Accessed March 14, 2022.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/possibility-philippine-sts-collaborating-toward-special-issue.
Blaser, Mario, and Marisol de la Cadena. 2018. “Introduction: Pluriverse, Proposals for a World of Many Worlds.” In A World of Many Worlds, edited by Mario Blaser and Marisol de la Cadena, 1–22. Durham: Duke University Press.
Chen, Ruey-Lin 陳瑞麟. 2012. “Discovering Distinctive East Asian STS: An Introduction.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 6(4): 441–43.
https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-1904753.
Clancey, Gregory. 2018. “Making STS Singaporean.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 12(1): 81–89.
https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-4196431.
ESTS Editorial Collective: Khandekar, Aalok, Noela Invernizzi, Duygu Kaşdoğan, Ali Kenner, Angela Okune, Grant Jun Otsuki, Sujatha Raman, Amanda Windle, and Emily York. 2021. “Infrastructuring ESTS.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 7(1): 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.1275.
ESTS Editorial Collective: Okune, Angela, Grant Jun Otsuki, Tim Schütz, Clément Dréano, Noela Invernizzi, Aalok Khandekar, Duygu Kaşdoğan, Ali Kenner, Sujatha Raman, Federico Vasen, Amanda Windle, and Emily York. 2022. “Open Research Data: Experimenting Towards a Publishing Infrastructure.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 8(2): 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2022.1885.
Finnegan, Diarmid A. 2008. “The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 41(2): 369–388.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737551.
Fortun, Kim. 2001. Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Henke, Christopher R., and Thomas F. Gieryn. 2008. “Sites of Scientific Practice: The Enduring Importance of Place.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, Third Edition, 353–376. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hubbard, Phil, and Rob Kitchin, eds. 2010. Key Thinkers on Space and Place. Second Edition. London, England: Sage Publications.
Jabareen, Yosef, and Efrat Eizenberg. 2021. “Theorizing Urban Social Spaces and Their Interrelations: New Perspectives on Urban Sociology, Politics, and Planning.” Planning Theory 20(3): 211–30.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220976942.
Kaşdoğan, Duygu. 2019. STS Across Borders Gallery Exhibit at 4S 2018. Image. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified January 18, 2019. Accessed May 31, 2021.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/sts-across-borders-gallery-exhibit-4s-2018.
Kaşdoğan, Duygu, and Kim Fortun. 2021. STS on Edge. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified June 24, 2021. Accessed May 30, 2022. https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/sts-edge.
Kenney, Martha. 2019. “Fables of Response-ability: Feminist Science Studies as Didactic Literature.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5(1): 1–39.
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29582.
Khandekar, Aalok. 2019. STS Across Borders Gallery Exhibit: 4S 2018, Sydney, Australia. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified February 20, 2019. Accessed May 31, 2021.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/sts-across-borders-gallery-exhibit-4s-2018-sydney-australia.
Khandekar, Aalok, Kim Fortun, Duygu Kaşdoğan, and Angela Okune. 2023. Khandekar, Aalok, Kim Fortun, Duygu Kaşdoğan, and Angela Okune. 2023. “Revisiting STS Across Borders: Interview with Aalok Khandekar and Kim Fortun, conducted by Duygu Kaşdoğan and Angela Okune.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(1): 165–172.
https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p40p48.
Khandekar, Aalok, Kim Fortun, and Gaudys L. Sanclemente. 2019. Innovating STS Exhibit Catalog: 4S 2019, New Orleans. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 28, 2019. Accessed May 31, 2021.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/innovating-sts-exhibit-catalog-4s-2019-new-orleans.
Kreimer, Pablo, and Hebe Vessuri. 2018. “Latin American Science, Technology, and Society: A Historical and Reflexive Approach.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 17–37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622.
Law, John. 2015. “What’s Wrong with a One-World World?” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 126–39.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2015.1020066.
Lefebvre, Henri. [1974] 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Livingstone, David N. 2003. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Low, Setha. 2017. Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London, England: Sage: Publications.
Merrifield, Andrew. 1993. “Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 18(4): 516–31.
https://doi.org/10.2307/622564.
Mohacsi Gergely, Grant Jun Otsuki, and Émile St. Pierre. 2023. “Locating Naturecultures.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(1): 125–147.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1085.
Naylor, Simon. 2005. “Historical Geography: Knowledge, in Place and on the Move.” Progress in Human Geography 29(5): 626–634.
https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph573pr.
Okune, Angela, and Leonida Mutuku. 2023. “Becoming an African Techpreneur: Geopolitics of Investments in “Local” Kenyan Entrepreneurship.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 9(1): 81–103.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1095.
Ophir, Adi, and Steven Shapin. 1991. “The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey.” Science in Context 4(1): 3–22.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700000132.
Pollock, Anne, and Banu Subramaniam. 2016. “Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(6): 951–66.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916657879.
Shapin, Steven. 1998. “Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23(1): 5–12.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/623153.
Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S). 2018. Website.
⸻. 2019. https://www.4s2019.org.
Soja, Edward. 2003. “Writing the City Spatially.” City: Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action. 7(3): 269–280.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481032000157478.
STS-Infrastructures. 2018. “Querying STS Formations,” last modified May 5, 2022. Accessed July 2, 2023.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/structured-analytics-questions-set/querying-sts-formations.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2022. Human Development Report 2021-22. Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives: Shaping our Future in a Transforming World. Published September 8, 2022. New York.
Verran, Helen. 2002. “A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies: Alternative Firing Regimes of Environmental Scientists and Aboriginal Landowners.” Social Studies of Science 32(5–6): 729–62.
Copyright (c) 2023 Duygu Kaşdoğan, Angela Okune
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.
