Collaborative Ethnography and Matters of Care in Counterspaces

  • Coleen Carrigan
  • Joyce Yen
  • Cara Margherio
  • Christine Grant
  • Claire Horner-Devine
  • Eve Riskin
  • Julie Ivy
  • Burren Peil

Abstract

This paper offers a reflexive analysis of an interdisciplinary and cross-race collaboration to advance equity in engineering called LATTICE (Launching Academics on the Tenure-Track: an Intentional Community in Engineering). We engage two bodies of scholarship—matters of care in feminist science and technology studies (STS) and critical race theory on counterspaces—to theorize on the data infrastructure and narrative practices that we developed when applying critical methodologies to collective action in technoscience. We discuss how our care practices conflicted with traditional ethnographic practices and thus, inspired us to innovate on methods. These methods—member-checking and polyvocal memo-ing—make transgressing the boundaries of LATTICE counterspaces for public dissemination possible by invoking caring as praxis. We conclude that using these methods to discuss the contradictions and challenges in STS collaborations is an opportunity for advancing mutual intelligibility among interdisciplinary scholars and a politics of knowledge production grounded in values of care and friendship that may contribute to equity and justice in technoscience.

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Anzaldúa, Gloria, ed. 1987. “La Conciencia de la Mestiza. Towards a New Consciousness” in Borderlands: La Frontera = The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.

Bailey, Alison. 2014. “The Unlevel Knowing Field: An Engagement with Dotson’s Third-Order Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3(10): 62–68.

http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-1Gs.

Bauer, Henry H. 1990. “Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS).” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15(1): 105–119.

https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500110.

Benjamin, Ruha. 2016. “Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 145–156.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.70.

⸻. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Breunlin, Rachel, and Helen A. Regis. 2009. “Can There Be a Critical Collaborative Ethnography?: Creativity and Activism in the Seventh Ward, New Orleans.” Collaborative Anthropologies 2(1): 115–146.

https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.0.0028.

Brown, Leslie, and Susan Strega. 2015. Research as Resistance: Revisiting Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-Oppressive Approaches. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Cantillon, Sara, and Kathleen Lynch. 2017. “Affective Equality: Love Matters.” Hypatia 32(1): 169–186.

https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12305.

Carrigan, Coleen. 2023. “Sheltering: Care Tactics for Ethnography Attentive to Intersectionality and Underrepresentation in Technoscience.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 9(2). 1–22.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v9i2.39368.

Carrigan, Coleen, and Caitlin C. Wylie, eds. 2023. “Introduction: Caring for Equitable Relations in Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 9(2): 1–16.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v9i2.41070.

Case, Andrew D., and Carla D. Hunter. 2012. “Counterspaces: A Unit of Analysis for Understanding the Role of Settings in Marginalized Individuals’ Adaptive Responses to Oppression.” American Journal of Community Psychology 50(1–2): 257–270.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9497-7.

Cech, Erin A. 2013. “Ideological Wage Inequalities? The Technical/Social Dualism and the Gender Wage Gap in Engineering.” Social Forces 91(4): 1147-1182.

https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot024.

Collins, Patricia Hill. 2009. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Tenth Anniversary Edition. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dace, Karen L., ed. 2012. Unlikely Allies in the Academy: Women of Color and White Women in Conversation. New York, NY: Routledge.

DeNora, Tia. 2001. “Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. By Michael P. Farrell.” Book Review. American Journal of Sociology 108(4): 911–913.

https://doi.org/10.1086/378469.

Denzin, Norman K. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography : Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243672.

Devere, Heather. 2013. “Amity Update: The Academic Debate on Friendship and Politics.” AMITY: The Journal of Friendship Studies 1(1): 5–33.

Dotson, Kristie. 2015. “Inheriting Patricia Hill Collins’s Black Feminist Epistemology.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(13): 2322–8.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1058496.

Du Bois, W. E. B. [1903] 1994. The Souls of Black Folk. Dover Thrift Editions: Black History. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Epicurus. 1964. Principles Doctrines, and Vatican Sayings. Translated by Russel Geer Mortimer, with an Introduction and Notes, by Russel M. Geor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

Farías, Ignacio. 2016. “A Collaborative Turn in STS?” EASST Review 35(1). Accessed February 10, 2024.

https://easst.net/easst-review/35-1/a-collaborative-turn-in-sts/.

Feenberg, Andrew. 2017. “A Critical Theory of Technology.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 635–663. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fitsch, Hannah, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser Trujillo, Cynthia Kraus, et al. 2020. “Coalition-Making and the Practice of Feminist STS in the Time of COVID-19.” Catalyst 6(2): 1–32.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.34640.

Forsythe, Diana E. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Introduction by David J. Hess. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001.

Greiffenhagen, Christian, Michael Mair, and Wes Sharrock. 2015. “Methodological Troubles as Problems and Phenomena: Ethnomethodology and the Question of ‘Method’ in the Social Sciences.” The British Journal of Sociology 66(3): 460–485.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12136.

Hackett, Edward J., and Diana R. Rhoten. 2011. “Engaged, Embedded, Enjoined: Science and Technology Studies in the National Science Foundation.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 823-838.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

Harding, Sandra G., ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Harrison, Faye V. 1991. “Ethnography as Politics.” In Decolonizing Anthropology: Moving Further Toward an Anthropology for Liberation, edited by Faye V. Harrison, 88–110. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.

Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1998. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Feminist Theory and Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy. 2012. Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Jerak-Zuiderent, Sonja. 2015. “Accountability from Somewhere and for Someone: Relating with Care.” Science as Culture 24(4): 412-35.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1050368.

Lassiter, Luke Eric. 2005. “The New (Critical) Ethnography: On Feminist and Postmodern Approaches to Collaboration.” In The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography, 48–75. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

⸻. 2008. “Moving Past Public Anthropology and Doing Collaborative Research.” NAPA Bulletin 29(1): 70–86.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4797.2008.00006.x.

Lassiter, Luke Eric, Brian A. Hoey, and Elizabeth Campbell, eds. 2020. I’m Afraid of that Water: A Collaborative Ethnography of a West Virginia Water Crisis. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.

LATTICE Team: Joyce Yen, Cara Margherio, Julie Ivy, Claire Horner-Devine, et al. 2020. “Diversity and Inclusion Begin With Trust” Prism Magazine. Opinion, November 2020. Accessed February 10, 2024.

http://www.asee-prism.org/last-word-nov-7/.

Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248.

https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.

Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Lezaun, Javier, Noortje Marres, and Manuel Tironi. 2017. “Experiments in Participation.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 195–222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 195–222.

Liboiron, Max. 2016. “Care and Solidarity Are Conditions for Interventionist Research.”

Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 67–72.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.85.

Lippert, Ingmar, and Rachel Douglas-Jones. 2019. “‘Doing Data’: Methodography in and of STS.” EASST Review 38(1): 35–39. Accessed February 10, 2024.

https://easst.net/easst-review/381/doing-data-methodography-in-and-of-sts/.

Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.

Lugones, María C., and Elizabeth V. Spelman. 1983. “Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for ‘The Woman’s Voice.’” Women’s Studies International Forum 6(6): 573–581.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(83)90019-5.

Mackinlay, Elizabeth, and Brydie-Leigh Bartleet. 2012. “Friendship as Research: Exploring the Potential of Sisterhood and Personal Relationships as the Foundations of Musicological and Ethnographic Fieldwork.” Qualitative Research Journal 12(1): 75–87.

https://doi.org/10.1108/14439881211222741.

Madison, D. Soyini. 2005. Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233826.

Martin, Aryn, Natasha Myers, and Ana Viseu. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625–641.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073.

McConnell, Elizabeth A., Nathan R. Todd, Charlynn Odahl-Ruan, and Mona Shattell. 2016. “Complicating Counterspaces: Intersectionality and the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival.” American Journal of Community Psychology 57(3–4): 473–488.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12051.

Merriam, Sharan B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publisher.

Mohan, Giles. 1999. “Not So Distant, not So Strange: The Personal and the Political in Participatory Research.” Ethics, Place & Environment: A Journal of Philosophy & Geography 2(1): 41–54.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1366879X.1999.11644237.

Murphy, Michelle. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.” Social Studies of Science 45(5): 717–737.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Niewöhner, Jörg. 2016. “Co-laborative Anthropology: Crafting Reflexivities Experimentally.” In Etnologinen tulkinta ja Analyysi: Kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia [Ethnological interpretation and analysis: Towards a transparent research process], edited by Jukka Jouhki and Steel Tytti, 81–125. Tallinn, Estonia: Ethnos.

Ong, Maria, Janet M. Smith, and Lily T. Ko. 2018. “Counterspaces for Women of Color in STEM Higher Education: Marginal and Central Spaces for Persistence and Success.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55(2): 206–245.

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21417.

Parker, John N., and Ugo Corte. 2017. “Placing Collaborative Circles in Strategic Action Fields: Explaining Differences between Highly Creative Groups.” Sociological Theory 35(4): 261–287.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117740400.

Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85–106.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301.

⸻. 2012. “‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review 60(2): 197–216.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.

Reese, Ashanté M. 2019. “Refusal as Care.” Blog: Anthropology News website. June 4, 2019. Accessed February 6, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.1111/AN.1181.

Reif, L. Rafael. 2010. “Report of the Initiative for Faculty Race and Diversity.” Letters to the Community. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. January 14, 2010. Accessed February 10, 2024.

http://web.mit.edu/provost/raceinitiative/.

Richter, David M., and Marie C. Paretti. 2009. “Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34(1): 29–45.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802710185.

Roy, Joseph, Carolyn Wilson, Angela Erdiaw-Kwasie, and Charles Stuppard. 2020. Engineering & Engineering Technology by the Numbers. 2019 Edition. Report. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Accessed February 26, 2023.

https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Engineering-by-the-Numbers-2019-JUNE-2021.pdf.

Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodology of the Oppressed: Theory out of Bounds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Sheffield, Frisbee C. C., ed. 2008. Plato: The Symposium. Translated by Margaret C. Howatson. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Simpson, Audra. 2007. “On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice,’ and Colonial Citizenship.” Junctures: The Journal of Thematic Dialogue 9: 67–80.

⸻. 2016. “Consent’s Revenge.” Cultural Anthropology 31(3): 326–333.

https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.02.

Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Sociology of the Invisible: The Primacy of Work in the Writings of Anselm Strauss.” In Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, edited by David R. Maines, 263–283. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

⸻. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377–391.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326.

Stavrianakis, Anthony. 2015. “From Anthropologist to Actant (and back to Anthropology): Position, Impasse, and Observation in Sociotechnical Collaboration.” Cultural Anthropology 30(1): 167-189.

https://doi.org/10.14506/ca30.1.09.

Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans & Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418.

⸻. 2015. “Situational Awareness: Deadly Bioconvergence at the Boundaries of Bodies and Machines.” Media Tropes 5(1): 1–24.

Tallbear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt46npt0.

Tilley, Liz, and Kate Woodthorpe. 2011. “Is It the End for Anonymity As We Know It? A Critical Examination of the Ethical Principle of Anonymity in the Context of 21st Century Demands on the Qualitative Researcher.” Qualitative Research 11(2): 197–212.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110394073.

Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2014. R-Words: Refusing Research. In Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, edited by Django Paris and Marisha T. Winn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781544329611.n12.

Turk-Bicakci, Lori, and Andrea Berger. 2014. “Leaving STEM: STEM Ph.D. Holders in Non-STEM Careers.” Issue Brief. July 2014. American Institutes for Research (AIR), 1–11. Accessed February 10, 2024.

https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/STEM%20PhDs%20in%20non-STEM%20Careers_July%202014.pdf.

Turkle, Sherry, ed. 2007. Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Turner, V. Kelly, Karina Benessaiah, Scott Warren, and David Iwaniec. 2015. “Essential Tensions in Interdisciplinary Scholarship: Navigating Challenges in Affect, Epistemologies, and Structure in Environment–Society Research Centers.” Higher Education 70(4): 649–665.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9859-9.

Viseu, Ana. 2015. “Caring for Nanotechnology? Being an Integrated Social Scientist.” Social Studies of Science 45(5): 642–664.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715598666.

Wylie, Alison. 2012. “The Feminism Question in Science: What Does It Mean to ‘Do Social Science as a Feminist’?” In The Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, edited by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber, 544–56. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Published
22 Apr 2024
Section
Original Research Articles