When ‘Open’ is Still Far from Good Enough: The Work of Counter-Mapping with Political Software
Abstract
What does “openness” mean when it comes to crafting digital tools and infrastructures for housing justice action research? This question is particularly urgent as global internet companies unleash new geospatial technologies to track and surveil. In this article, we examine the corporate software dependencies and organizational practices that the Anti-Eviction Mapping Project (AEMP) have encountered in its counter-mapping work. Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) projects for counter-cartography have been developed to support both social research and housing justice work, but little collaboration between FOSS developers, critical cartographers, and community organizers has been fostered and sustained to date. In order to address this critical gap, we analyze project documentation alongside software development practices to discuss AEMP members’ experiences in developing open technologies for the “Covid-19 Housing Map.” We elaborate on the distinction between “political software” and “software politics” as an analytic device to describe contrasting modes of engagement with digital design. We demonstrate that FOSS adoption is not a simple matter of technological choice, but rather a complex sociotechnical process that fundamentally alters technopolitical relations and forms of political action. For the conclusion, we reflect on the broader implications of the technopolitical challenges that AEMP encountered, while also examining possibilities for creating and supporting “political software” aligned with the goals of housing action research.
References
Abbate, Janet. 2012. Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 205–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alcaras, Gabriel. 2020. “Des biens industriels publics. Genèse de l’insertion des logiciels libres dans la Silicon Valley” [Industrial public goods: A genesis of the insertion of free software in Silicon Valley]. Sociologie du travail [Sociology of Work] 62(3).
https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.33283.
Amrute, Sareeta. 2016. Encoding Race, Encoding Class: Indian IT Workers in Berlin. Durham: Duke University Press.
Amrute, Sareeta, and Luis Felipe R. Murillo. 2020. “Introduction: Computing in/from the South,”Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(2): 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.34594.
Anti-Eviction Mapping Project. 2021. Counterpoints: A San Francisco Bay Area Atlas of Displacement and Resistance. Oakland: PM Press.
Bateson, Gregory. [1972] 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Kent, Mike Beedle, Arie van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, et al. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Accessed September 10, 2021.
https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/manifesto.html.
Beltrán, Héctor. 2023. Code Work: Hacking Across the US/México Techno-Borderlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Benkler, Yochai, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2006. “Commons-Based Peer Production and Virtue.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4): 394–419.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x.
Birkinbine, Benjamin J. 2020. Incorporating the Digital Commons: Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software. London: University of Westminster Press.
Boyle, James. 2008. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Caffentzis, George, and Silvia Federici. 2014. “Commons Against and Beyond Capitalism.” In “Commons Sense: New Thinking About an Old Idea,” edited by Mary McDermott, Tom O’Connell, and Órla O’Donovan. Supplement, Community Development Journal 49(S1): i92–i105.
Caillé, Alain. 2007. Anthropologie du don: le tiers paradigme [Anthropology of the gift: The third paradigm]. Paris: La Découverte.
Chan, Anita Say. 2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coleman, Enid Gabriella. 2013. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, Biella, and Mako Hill. 2004. “How Free Became Open and Everything Else under the Sun: Introduction.” Media/Culture Journal 7(3).
https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2352.
Corsín Jiménez, Alberto, and Adolfo Estalella. 2023. Free Culture and the City: Hackers, Commoners, and Neighbors in Madrid, 1997–2017. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dalton, Craig M., and Tim Stallman. 2018. “Counter–Mapping Data Science,” in “Speculative and Constructively Critical GIS,” edited by Jim E. Thatcher, Luke Bergmann, and David O’Sullivan, special issue, The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 62(1): 93–101.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12398.
Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2019. Common: On Revolution in the 21st Century. Translated by Matthew MacLellan. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downey, Gary Lee, and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, eds. 2021. Making & Doing: Activating STS Through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dunbar-Hester, Christina. 2020. Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ehmke, Coraline Ada. 2025. We Just Build Hammers: Stories from the Past, Present, and Future of Responsible Tech. New York: Apress.
Elwood, Sarah. 2006. “Beyond Cooptation or Resistance: Urban Spatial Politics, Community Organizations, and GIS-Based Spatial Narratives.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96(2): 323–341.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x.
Ensmenger, Nathan L. 2010. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Faulkner, Wendy. 2001. “The Technology Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist Technology Studies.” Women’s Studies International Forum 24(1): 79–95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7.
Federici, Silvia. 2018. Re-Enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. Oakland: PM Press.
Forsythe, Diana E. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Edited by David J. Hess. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ghertner, D. Asher. 2015. “Why Gentrification Theory Fails in ‘Much of the World.’” City: Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action 19(4): 552–63.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1051745.
Gieseking, Jen Jack. 2018. “Operating Anew: Queering GIS with Good Enough Software,” in “Speculative and Constructively Critical GIS,” edited by Jim E. Thatcher, Luke Bergmann, and David O’Sullivan, special issue, The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 62(1): 55–66.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12397.
Graziani, Terra, and Mary Shi. 2020. “Data for Justice: Tensions and Lessons from the Anti-Eviction Mapping Project’s Work Between Academia and Activism.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 19(1): 397–412.
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v19i1.1776.
Halperin, Brett A., and Erin McElroy. 2023. “Temporal Tensions in Digital Story Mapping for Housing Justice: Rethinking Time and Technology in Community-Based Design.” In DIS ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2469–88. Pittsburgh: ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596088.
Hao, Karen. 2025. Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman’s OpenAI. New York: Penguin Random House.
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons: The Population Problem has No Technical Solution; it Requires a Fundamental Extension in Morality.” Science 162(3859): 1243–8.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Harris, Malcolm. 2023. Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Harvey, David. 2011. “The Future of the Commons.” Radical History Review (109): 101–7.
https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2010-017.
Hicks, Mar. 2021. “Sexism Is a Feature, Not a Bug.” In Your Computer Is on Fire, edited by Thomas S. Mullaney, Benjamin Peters, Mar Hicks, and Kavita Philip, 135–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hippel, Eric von, and Georg von Krogh. 2003. “Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science.” Organization Science 14(2): 209–23.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992.
Hohl, Philipp, Jil Klünder, Arie van Bennekum, Ryan Lockard, et al. 2018. “Back to the Future: Origins and Directions of the ‘Agile Manifesto’—Views of the Originators.” Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 6: 1–27.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-018-0059-z.
Iralu, Elspeth. 2021. “Putting Indian Country on the Map: Indigenous Practices of Spatial Justice.” Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 53(5): 1485–1502.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ANTI.12734.
Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press.
kollektiv orangotango+, ed. 2018. This Is Not an Atlas: A Global Collection of Counter-Cartographies. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Kwet, Michael. 2019. “Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South.” Race & Class 60(4): 3–26.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172.
Leach, James, Dawn Nafus, and Bernhard Krieger. 2009. “Freedom Imagined: Morality and Aesthetics in Open Source Software Design.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 74(1): 51–71.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751188.
Liu, Wendy. 2020. Abolish Silicon Valley: How to Liberate Technology from Capitalism. London: Watkins Media Limited.
Maharawal, Manissa M., and Erin McElroy. 2018. “The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History toward Bay Area Housing Justice.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(2): 380–89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1365583.
Mauss, Marcel. 1985. Sociologie et anthropologie [Sociology and anthropology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
McElroy, Erin. 2022. “Digital Cartographies of Displacement: Data as Property and Property as Data” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 21(4): 357–71.
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v21i4.1959.
⸻. 2024. Silicon Valley Imperialism: Techno Fantasies and Frictions in Postsocialist Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
McElroy, Erin, and Alex Werth. 2019. “Deracinated Dispossessions: On the Foreclosures of ‘Gentrification’ in Oakland, CA.” Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 51(3): 878–98.
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12528.
McIlwain, Charlton D. 2020. Black Software: The Internet and Racial Justice, from the AfroNet to Black Lives Matter. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moglen, Eben. 2004. “Freeing the Mind: Free Software and the Death of Proprietary Culture.” Maine Law Review 56(1): 1–12.
https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol56/iss1/2.
Murillo, Luis Felipe R. 2025. Common Circuits: Hacking Alternative Technological Futures. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nafus, Dawn. 2012. “‘Patches Don’t Have Gender’: What Is Not Open in Open Source Software.” New Media & Society 14(4): 669–83.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422887.
Noble, Safiya Umoja, and Sarah T. Roberts. 2019. “Technological Elites, the Meritocracy, and Postracial Myths in Silicon Valley.” In Racism Postrace, edited by Roopali Mukherjee, Sarah Banet-Weiser, and Herman Gray, 113–29. Durham: Duke University Press.
Obeng-Odoom, Franklin. 2021. The Commons in an Age of Uncertainty: Decolonizing Nature, Economy, and Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
O’Neil, Mathieu, Laure Muselli, Xiaolan Cai, and Stefano Zacchiroli. 2024. “Co-Producing Industrial Public Goods on GitHub: Selective Firm Cooperation, Volunteer-Employee Labour and Participation Inequality.” New Media & Society 26(5): 2556–92.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221090474.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfaffenberger, Bryan. 1992. “Social Anthropology of Technology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 491–516.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423.
Poppendieck, Mary and Tom Poppendieck. 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Reagle, Joseph. 2013. “‘Free as in Sexist?’ Free Culture and the Gender Gap.” First Monday 18(1).
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.4291.
Rider, Karina. 2022. “Building Ideal Workplaces: Labor, Affect, and Identity in Tech for Good Projects.” International Journal of Communication 16: 5005–22.
Rivera, Isaac. 2024. “Towards Accountable Digital Geographies.” Dialogues in Human Geography 14(2): 317–321.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231177080.
Sadowski, Jathan. 2020. “The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism.” Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 52(2): 562–80.
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595.
Schneider, Nathan. 2022. “The Tyranny of Openness: What Happened to Peer Production?” Feminist Media Studies 22(6): 1411–1428.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1890183.
Schneier, Bruce. 2015. Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Simondon, Gilbert. [1958] 2012. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques [On the mode of existence of technical objects]. Paris: Aubier.
⸻. 2014. Sur la technique (1953–1983) [On technique (1953–1983)]. Compiled by Nathalie Simondon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Snowden, Edward J. 2019. Permanent Record. London: Pan Macmillan.
Söderberg, Johan, and Maxigas. 2022. Resistance to the Current: The Dialectics of Hacking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Star, Susan Leigh, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2010. “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, edited by Leah A. Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone, 230–245. London: Sage.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Suchman, Lucy A. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takhteyev, Yuri. 2012. Coding Places: Software Practice in a South American City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2022. After the Internet: Digital Networks between Capital and the Common. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tkacz, Nathaniel. 2012. “From Open Source to Open Government : A Critique of Open Politics” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 12(4): 386–405.
Toupin, Sophie. 2014. “Feminist Hackerspaces: The Synthesis of Feminist and Hacker Cultures.” Journal of Peer Production 5: 1–9.
Velazquez, Maria. 2021. “Precarity by Design: Tenant Oral Histories in the Evolving Terrain of ‘Eviction Moratoriums,’” paper presented in the panel “Techniques, Technologies, and Relationships in Mapping Evictions,” Society for the Social Studies of Science Annual Conference, Toronto, October 7, 2021.
Widder, David Gray, Meredith Whittaker, and Sarah Myers West. 2024. “Why ‘Open’ AI Systems are Actually Closed, and Why this Matters.” Nature 635(8040): 827–33.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08141-1.
Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Felipe R. Murillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
