Assembling Sociality in Caring Spaces: Culturally Sensitive Robot Deployment During the Pandemic in Residential Care Homes in Ireland and Japan
Abstract
Can robots help care professionals deliver person-centered care? If so, how? The questions concerning the relationship between care and technology have long been a focus of debate and discussion. The Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated the development of various technologies and opened the door to trialing products and services that had previously been deemed unsuitable for care settings. Seizing the moment of change, we conducted fieldwork in two residential care homes (one in Ireland and the other in Japan) to observe caregiving processes through the deployment and use of an originally developed functional air-purification robot. Using the concepts of “carescape” and “assemblage,” the complex relationship between people, assistive technologies and care were explored. The focus of this paper is to outline key insights arising from these pilot deployments, particularly in relation to the intersection between the act of caring and the use of robots. Through ethnographic observations, interviews and focus groups with care professionals, we found the hybrid collective nature of using a robot by care professionals as well as a polysemic understanding of care. The insights gained from this study shed light on some of the potential common ingredients when a chain of care is triggered by culturally sensitive deployment and use of technologies such as care robots.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. HOMO SACER Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Alač, Morana. 2009. “Moving Android: On Social Robots and Body-in-Interaction.” Social Studies of Science 39(4): 491–528.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709103476.
⸻. 2016. “Social Robots: Things or Agents?” AI & Society 31 (4): 519–35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6.
Alač, Morana, Javier Movellan, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2011. “When a Robot Is Social: Spatial Arrangements and Multimodal Semiotic Engagement in the Practice of Social Robotics.” Social Studies of Science 41(6): 893–926.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711420565.
Bender, Shawn. 2025. Feeling Machines: Japanese Robotics and the Global Entanglements of More-than-Human Care. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bentley, Claire L., Gail Mountain, Alison Orrell, and Lauren A. Powell. 2018. “Making Telecare Desirable Rather than a Last Resort.” Ageing and Society 38(5): 926–53.
https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/S0144686X16001355.
Bowlby, Sophie. 2012. “Recognising the Time—Space Dimensions of Care: Caringscapes and Carescapes.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44(9): 2101–18.
https://doi.org/10.1068/a44492.
Buch, Elana D. 2015. “Anthropology of Aging and Care.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44(October): 277–93.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254.
Callon, Michel, and Michel Ferrary. 2006. “Les Réseaux Sociaux à l’aune de La Théorie de l’acteur-Réseau.” Sociologies Pratiques 13(2): 37–44.
https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.013.0037.
Chang, Wan-Ling, and Selma Šabanović. 2014. “Exploring Taiwanese Nursing Homes as Product Ecologies for Assistive Robots.” Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts, Evanston, IL, September 11-13, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2014.7020976.
⸻. 2015. “Studying Socially Assistive Robots in Their Organizational Context: Studies with PARO in a Nursing Home.” In HRI '15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Portland, OR, March 2–5, 2015. pp.227–28.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702722.
Chen Xiao-Jing 陳暁静. 2014. “カタカナ語「ケア」及び「介護」の語誌的研究 ―1880 年から 2000 年まで『朝日新聞』に基づいての概観 [An Etymological Study of the Katakana Loanword Kea and Kaigo: An Overview Based on the Asahi Shinbun (1880-2000)].” Ritsumeikan University 立命館文学 639(October): 209–223.
https://doi.org/10.34382/00006505.
Chevallier, Martin. 2022. “Staging Paro: The Care of Making Robot(s) Care.” Social Studies of Science 53(5): 635–59.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221126148.
Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2011. “You, Robot: On the Linguistic Construction of Artificial Others.” AI & Society 26(1): 61-69.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0289-z.
Coopmans, Catelijne, and Karen M. McNamara. 2020. “Care in Translation: Care-Ful Research in Medical Settings.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 14(1): 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8193729.
De Togni, Giulia, Sonja Erikainen, Sarah Chan, and Sarah Cunningham-Burley. 2021. “What Makes AI ‘Intelligent’ and ‘Caring’? Exploring Affect and Relationality across Three Sites of Intelligence and Care.” Social Science and Medicine 277(May): 113874.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874.
Elish, Madeleine Clare. 2019. “Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 5: 40–60.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.260.
Giorgi, Ioanna, Francesca Tirotto, Oksana Hagen, and Farida Aider, et al. 2022. “Friendly but Faulty: A Pilot Study on the Perceived Trust of Older Adults in a Social Robot.” IEEE Access 10(August): 92084–96.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202942.
Hammershøj, Lars Geer. 2019. “The New Division of Labor between Human and Machine and Its Educational Implications.” Technology in Society 59(November): 101142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.05.006.
Ide, Hiroo, Sayuri Suwa, Yumi Akuta, and Naonori Kodate, et al. 2024. “Developing a Model to Explain Users’ Ethical Perceptions Regarding the Use of Care Robots in Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ireland, Finland, and Japan.” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 116(January): 105137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.105137.
Ivanova, Dara, Iris Wallenburg, and Roland Bal. 2016. “Care in Place: A Case Study of Assembling a Carescape.” Sociology of Health and Illness 38(8): 1336–49.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12477.
Jones, Raya A. 2017. “What Makes a Robot ‘Social’?” Social Studies of Science 47(4): 556–79.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717704722.
Jordan, John M. 2016. Robots. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kanzaki, Yuki [神崎 由紀]. 2013. “地域で暮らす高齢者の見守りの概念分析 [Concept Analysis of ‘Mimamori’ for Community-Dwelling Elderly People].” Journal of Japan Academy of Nursing Science 33(1): 34–41.
https://doi.org/10.5630/jans.33.1_34.
Kenway, Emily. 2023. Who Cares: The Hidden Crisis of Caregiving, and How We Solve It. London: Headline Publishing Group.
Kerruish, Erika. 2021. “Assembling Human Empathy towards Care Robots: The Human Labor of Robot Sociality.” Emotion, Space and Society 41(November): 100840.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100840.
Kleinman, Arthur, and Sjaak van der Geest. 2009. “‘Care’ in Health Care: Remaking the Moral World of Medicine.” Medische Antropologie 21(1): 159–68.
https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.314817.
Kodate, Naonori, and Vivek Nallur. 2025. “Can Robots Care and be Trusted?” In Social Robots with AI: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2024, edited by Johanna Seibt, Peter Fazekas, and Oliver Santiago Quick. (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). IOS Press BV.
Kodate, Naonori, Kazuko Obayashi, Hasheem Mannan, and Shigeru Masuyama. 2022. “Improving Care Quality in a Nursing Home in Japan: Organisational Culture, Robotics-aided Care and Systems Approach.” In Systems Thinking for Global Health: How Can Systems-thinking Contribute to Solving Key Challenges in Global Health?, edited by Fiona Larkin, Frédérique Vallières, Hasheem Mannan, and Naonori Kodate, 188–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kodate, Naonori, Kazuko Obayashi, Yurie Maeda, and Wenwei Yu, et al. 2023. “Care Professionals’ Experience of Deploying an Original Non-autonomous Air-purification Robot in Residential Care Homes in Ireland and Japan.” Paper presented at the 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), Istanbul, Turkiye, June 8–10, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156802.
Kruk, Margaret E., Anna D. Gage, Catherine Arsenault, and Keely Jordan, et al. 2018. “High-Quality Health Systems in the Sustainable Development Goals Era: Time for a Revolution.” The Lancet Global Health 6(11): E1196–E1252. .
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehoux, Pascale, and Dominique Grimard. 2018. “When Robots Care: Public Deliberations on How Technology and Humans May Support Independent Living for Older Adults.” Social Science & Medicine 211(August): 330–37.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2018.06.038.
Liboiron, Max. 2016. “Care and Solidarity Are Conditions for Interventionist Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 67–72.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.85.
Lindén, Lisa, and Doris Lydahl. 2021. “Editorial: Care in STS.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 9(1): 3–12.
https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000.
Lipp, Benjamin. 2022. “Caring for Robots: How Care Comes to Matter in Human-Machine Interfacing.” Social Studies of Science 53(5): 660–85.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221081446.
Lydahl, Doris. 2023. “Good Care and Adverse Effects: Exploring the Use of Social Alarms in Care for Older People in Sweden.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 28(4): 559–77.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593231185260.
Malone, Thomas W., and Michael S. Bernstein, eds. 2015. Handbook of Collective Intelligence. London: MIT Press.
Martin, Aryn, Natasha Myers, and Ana Viseu. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625–41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073.
McDonald, Bernard, Thomas Scharf, and Kieran Walsh. 2021. “Older People’s Lived Experience and the World Health Organization Age-Friendly Policy Framework: A Critical Examination of an Age-Friendly County Programme in Ireland.” Ageing and Society 43(8): 1784-1809.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001355.
Milligan, Christine, and Janine Wiles. 2010. “Landscapes of Care.” Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 736–54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510364556.
Mirnig, Nicole, Gerald Stollnberger, Markus Miksch, and Susanne Stadler et al. 2017. “To Err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act toward an Erroneous Social Robot.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4(May): Article 21.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00021.
Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.
Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, eds. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Mutlu, Bilge, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. “Robots in Organizations: The Role of Workflow, Social, and Environmental Factors in Human-Robot Interaction.” In HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, March 12–15, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860.
Ngankam, Hubert, Célia Lignon, Maxime Lussier, and Aline Aboujaoudé, et al. 2023. “My Iliad: A Ludic Interface Using Ambient Assistive Technology to Promote Aging in Place.” In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population: 9th International Conference, ITAP 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, Proceedings, Part II, edited by Qin Gao and Jia Zhou, 31-46. Cham: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34917-1_3.
Obayashi, Kazuko, Naonori Kodate, Hiromasa Kondo, and Yoshimi Okamoto, et al. 2021. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Organizational Resilience as Unanticipated Outcome of Introducing Socially Assistive Robots in Nursing Homes.” Geriatrics and Gerontology International 21(8): 752-54.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14222.
Park, Sihyun, and Yejung Ko. 2020. “The Sociocultural Meaning of ‘My Place’: Rural Korean Elderly People’s Perspective of Aging in Place.” Asian Nursing Research 14(2): 97–104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.04.001.
Pols, Jeannette. 2004. “Good Care: Enacting a Complex Ideal in Long-Term Psychiatry.” PhD diss., University of Twente.
⸻. 2008. “Which Empirical Research, Whose Ethics? Articulating Ideals in Long-Term Mental Health Care.” In Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry, edited by Guy Widdershoven, John McMillan, Tony Hope, and Lieke Van der Scheer, 51–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
⸻. 2010. “The Heart of the Matter. About Good Nursing and Telecare.” Health Care Analysis 18(4): 374–88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0140-1.
⸻. 2012. Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wp5zw.
Portigal, Steve, and Lynn Shade. 2003. “Kawaii: Adventures in a Parallel Universe.” In DUX '03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, June 6–7, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997110.
Prendergast, David, dir., Naonori Kodate, and Daniel Balteanu. 2021. Circuits of Care: Ageing and Japan’s Robot Revolution. Maynooth University Visual Ethnography Lab.
https://feelsales.com/en/catalogo/circuits-of-care-ageing-and-japans-robot-revolution/.
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85–106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301.
Robertson, Jennifer. 2007. “Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Humanoid Robots and the Posthuman Family.” Critical Asian Studies 39(3): 369–98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710701527378.
⸻. 2018. Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Robots, Gender, Family, and the Japanese Nation. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Šabanović, Selma. 2014. “Inventing Japan’s ‘Robotics Culture’: The Repeated Assembly of Science, Technology, and Culture in Social Robotics.” Social Studies of Science 44(3): 342–67.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713509704.
Sharkey, Amanda. 2014. “Robots and Human Dignity: A Consideration of the Effects of Robot Care on the Dignity of Older People.” Ethics and Information Technology 16(1): 63–75.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5.
Shaw, David M. 2020. “Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17(4): 531–34.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10015-w.
Søraa, Roger Andre, Pernille Nyvoll, Gunhild Tøndel, and Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, et al. 2021. “The Social Dimension of Domesticating Technology: Interactions between Older Adults, Caregivers, and Robots in the Home.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167(June): 120678.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120678.
Suchman, Lucy. 2006. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418.
Trnka, Susanna Helen. 2016. “Digital Care: Agency and Temporality in Young People’s Use of Health Apps.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 248–65.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.119.
Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Wilkinson, Iain, and Arthur Kleinman. 2016. A Passion for Society: How We Think about Human Suffering. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Wright, James Adrian. 2023. Robots Won’t Save Japan: An Ethnography of Eldercare Automation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yanagita, Kunio 柳田国男. 1969. “日本の祭 [Festivals in Japan].” Kadokawa.
Copyright (c) 2024 Naonori Kodate, Pranav Kohli, Yurie Maeda, Kazuko Obayashi, David Prendergast, Shigeru Masuyama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
