Adding Government to Proof: Police Reports, the Limits of Standardization, and Data Proliferation in Crime Analysis
Abstract
This paper engages how crime analysts turn “ill-structured” reports into “good,” analyzable data. Based on qualitative field research in a police department, the empirical analysis retraces the manual labor that is necessary to navigate the conflicting informational requirements of the criminal justice system and aggregate analytics. Building on Desrosières’ concept of the duality of data as both “proof” and “government,” the paper explicates how, vis-à-vis the limits of standardization in police reporting, analysts revert to forms of data proliferation to create (temporary) governmental functions while leaving the original structure and proof function of reports, as required by the logics of the criminal justice system, intact. In explicating this work, the paper contributes to debates in STS and criminology by foregrounding the role of manual labor in reconciling different knowledge and communication logics that characterize the tensions between proof and government.
References
Baldwin, John. 1993. “Police Interview Techniques: Establishing Truth or Proof?” The British Journal of Criminology 33(3): 325–352.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048329.
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chan, Janet B. L. 2001. “The Technological Game: How Information Technology is Transforming Police Practice.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 1(2): 139–159.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802501001002001.
Cope, Nina. 2008. “‘Interpretation for Action?’: Definitions and Potential of Crime Analysis for Policing.” In Handbook of Policing, edited by Tim Newburn, 404-429. Cullompton and Portland: Willan Publishing.
Dahlstedt, Palle. 2019. “Big Data and Creativity.” European Review 27(3): 411–439.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798719000073.
Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Translated by Camille Naish. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
⸻. 2014. Prouver et gouverner: Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques [Proof and government: a political analysis of public statistics]. Paris: La Découverte.
Donoghue, Thomas, Bradley Voytek, and Shannon E. Ellis. 2021. “Teaching Creative and Practical Data Science at Scale.” In “Computing in the Statistics and Data Science Curriculum,” edited by Nicholas J. Horton and Johanna S. Hardin. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education 29(S1): S27–39.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1860725.
Egbert, Simon, Vasilis Galis, and Helene Oppen Ingebrigtsen Gundhus. 2024. “The Role of Data Integration and Analysis Platforms in Contemporary Society: An Introduction.” Information, Communication & Society 27(13): 2333–2342.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2433556.
Egbert, Simon, and Matthias Leese. 2021. Criminal Futures: Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work. London: Routledge.
Ericson, Richard V., and Clifford Shearing. 1986. “The Scientification of Police Work.” In The Knowledge Society: The Growing Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Social Relations, edited by Gernot Böhme and Nico Stehr, 129-159. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fisher, Stanley Z. 1993. “‘Just the Facts, Ma’am’: Lying and the Omission of Exculpatory Evidence in Police Reports.” New England Law Review 28(1): 1–62.
Gundhus, Helene O. I., Niri Talberg, and Christin T. Wathne. 2022a. “From Discretion to Standardization: Digitalization of the Police Organization.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 24(1): 27–41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211036554.
⸻. 2022b. “False Reporting in the Norwegian Police: Analyzing Counter-Productive Elements in Performance Management Systems.” Criminal Justice Ethics 41(3): 191–214.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2022.2146321.
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hagmann, Jonas, and Matthias Leese. 2024. “Vom Sachverhalt zum Datengehalt: Polizeiliche Rapportierungspraxis zwischen Einzelfall und Aggregatebene” [From Facts to Data: Police Reporting Practices Between Individual Cases and the Aggregate Level]. Kriminologisches Journal [Criminological Journal] 56(3): 177–194.
https://doi.org/10.3262/KJ2403177.
Kaufmann, Mareile, Simon Egbert, and Matthias Leese. 2019. “Predictive Policing and the Politics of Patterns.” The British Journal of Criminology 59(3): 674–692.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy060.
Leese, Matthias. 2023. “Enacting Criminal Futures: Data Practices and Crime Prevention.” Policing and Society 33(3): 333–347.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2112192.
Lupton, Deborah. 2016. The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Manning, Peter K. 1992. “Technological Dramas and the Police: Statement and Counterstatement in Organizational Analysis.” Criminology 30(3): 327–346.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01107.x.
Miller, Larry S., and John T. Whitehead. 2011. Report Writing for Criminal Justice Professionals. Fourth Edition. Burlington: Elsevier.
Morrison, Margaret, and Mary S. Morgan. 1999. “Models as Mediating Instruments.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Mary S. Morgan and Margaret Morrison, 10–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muniesa, Fabian, Yuval Millo, and Michel Callon. 2007. “An Introduction to Market Devices.” In “Market Devices,” edited by Fabian Muniesa, Yuval Millo, and Michel Callon. The Sociological Review 55(S2): S1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x.
O’Keeffe, Stephanie, Jennifer M. Brown, and Evanthia Lyons. 2009. “Seeking Proof or Truth: Naturalistic Decision-Making by Police Officers When Considering Rape Allegations.” In Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking, edited by Miranda A. H. Horvath and Jennifer M. Brown, 229–253. London: Routledge.
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Provost, Foster, and Tom Fawcett. 2013. “Data Science and Its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making.” Big Data 1(1): 51–59.
https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.1508.
Redwine, Kirk B. 2003. The Importance of Police Reports. Criminal Justice Institute, School of Law Enforcement Supervision Paper, University of Arkansas. Accessed September 21, 2025.
https://www.cji.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/importance_of_police_reports.pdf.
Santos, Rachel Boba. 2013. Crime Analysis With Crime Mapping. Third Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Star, Susan Leigh, and Martha Lampland. 2009. “Reckoning with Standards.” In Standards and their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, edited by Martha Lampland and Susan Leigh Star, 3–33. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Thévenot, Laurent. 2009. “Postscript to the Special Issue: Governing Life by Standards: A View from Engagements.” Social Studies of Science 39(5): 793–813.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709338767.
Waardenburg, Lauren, Anastasia Sergeeva, and Marleen Huysman. 2024. “The Hidden Cost of Data Production: Digital Reporting Pressures and the Consequences for Street-Level Police Work.” In Proceedings of the 45th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 1–17.
https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/469f3f3d-da5c-43a1-9c71-30419926e5fc.
Watson-Verran, Helen, and David Turnbull. 1995. “Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor J. Pinch, 115-139. Revised Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yu, Han, and Natalie Monas. 2020. “Recreating the Scene: An Investigation of Police Report Writing.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 50(1): 35–55.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281618812441.
Zedner, Lucia. 2007. “Pre-crime and Post-criminology?” Theoretical Criminology 11(2): 261–281.
