Entangled Areas: Reactivating Southeast Asia in the Anthropocene
Abstract
Since the turn of the millennium, the Anthropocene has heralded a series of wide-ranging transformations in the social sciences. Today, environmental humanities, new materialism actor-network theory, multi-species and more-than-human anthropologies, and critical zones all share interest earthly entanglements. In Southeast Asia, many of the prominent entanglements are disastrous—ecological degradation, mega pollution, accelerating precarity, sinking cities. A growing body of literature examines entanglements of humans, plants, and animals in Asian areas. In dialogue with this literature, the present set of engagements explore the proposition that Anthropocene entanglements call for a deeper rethinking of the notion of area itself. We are at a moment where the STS analytics of entanglement can be used to reactivate Southeast Asian – and other – areas. Shaped in heterogeneous perceptual, conceptual, sensorial, and political registers, areas emerge in the following set of engagements as layered multiplicities, each with its own distinctive grip on reality. Our gambit is that the ways in which entanglements make areas becomes a critical issue for STS as we go deeper into the Anthropocene.
References
Anderson, Warwick. 2002. “Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 32(5–6): 643–658.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631270203200502.
Anderson, Warwick, and Vincanne Adams. 2008. “Pramoedya’s Chickens: Postcolonial Studies of Technoscience.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 181–204. Third Edition. Cambridge, MA and London, England: MIT Press.
Brown, Steven D., and Rose Capdevila. 1999. “Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force and the Sociology of Translation.” In Actor-Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 26–50. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bowen, John. 2004. “The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States.” In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by David L. Szanton, 386–425. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour. 1981. “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them Do So.” In Advances in Social theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro Sociologies, edited by Karin Knorr-Cetina and Aaron V. Cicourel, 277–303. London, England: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
Chandler, David. 2018. Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene: An Introduction to Mapping, Sensing and Hacking. London, England and New York: Routledge.
Chou, Cynthia. 2017. “The Case for Reconceptualizing Southeast Asian Studies.” In Area Studies at the Crossroads: Knowledge Production After the Mobility Turn, edited by Katja Mielke and Anna-Katharina Hornidge, 233–249. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Chow, Rey. 1990. “The Politics and Pedagogy of Asian Literatures in American Universities.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 2(3): 29–51.
https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2-3-29.
Collins, Elizabeth Fuller. 2010. “Reflections on the Study of Southeast Asia by Western Scholars.” Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 17–27.
Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. 2000. “The ‘Anthropocene.’” Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.
de la Cadena, Marisol, and Mario Blaser, eds. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC and London, England: Duke University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, England: The Athlone Press.
Derichs, Claudia, Ariel Heryanto, and Itty Abraham. 2020. “Area Studies and Disciplines: What Disciplines and What Areas?” International Quarterly for Asian Studies 51(3–4): 35–49.
https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2020.3-4.13361.
Elinoff, Eli, and Tyson Vaughan, eds. 2021. Disastrous Times: Beyond Environmental Crisis in Urbanizing Asia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Fleschenberg, Andrea, and Benjamin Baumann. 2020. “Editorial: New Area Studies and Southeast Asia—Mapping Ideas, Agendas, Debates and Critique.” International Quarterly for Asian Studies 51(3–4): 5–16.
https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2020.3-4.13846.
Giraud, Eva Haifa. 2019. What Comes After Entanglement? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion. Durham, NC and London, England: Duke University Press.
Grant, Jenna. 2025. “Regioning with Resistance: Borderlands and Africa-Greater Mekong Subregion.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 120–134.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3067.
Gutierrez, Kathleen Cruz, and Paul Michael Leonardo Atienza. 2023. “Introduction: STS in the Philippines.” Special issue, Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints 71(1): 1–16.
Halpern, Manfred. 1962. “Middle Eastern Studies: A Review of the State of the Field with a Few Examples.” World Politics 15(1): 108–122.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2009570.
Haraway, Donna J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
⸻. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN and London, England: University of Minnesota Press.
Harootunian, Harry. 2000. History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hau, Caroline S. 2020. “For Whom Are Southeast Asian Studies?” Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 56(2): 59–98.
Hecht, Gabrielle, ed. 2011. Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA and London, England: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262515788.001.0001.
Heine-Geldern, Robert. 1942. “Conceptions of State and Kingship in Southeast Asia.” The Far Eastern Quarterly 2(1): 15–30.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2049276.
Heryanto, Ariel. 2002. “Can There Be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies?” Mousson: Social Science Research on Southeast Asia (5): 3–30.
https://doi.org/10.4000/moussons.2658.
Hetherington, Kregg. 2020. The Government of Beans: Regulating Life in the Age of Monocrops. Durham, NC and London, England: Duke University Press.
Houben, Vincent, Ramon Guillermo, and Elísio Macamo. 2020. “A Comment on Vincent Houben’s ‘New Area Studies as an Emerging Discipline. The Way Ahead for Southeast Asian Studies.’” International Quarterly for Asian Studies 51(3–4): 51–64.
https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2020.3-4.13363.
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2007. “Entangled Areas: Reactivating Southeast Asia in the Anthropocene.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 5–19.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.2887.
⸻. 2017. “Mekong Scales: Domains, Test-Sites, and the Uncommons.” Anthropologica 59(2): 204–215.
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.59.2.t03.
⸻. 2021. “Material Itineraries: Southeast Asian Urban Transformations.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 15(2): 124–134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2021.1917840.
⸻, ed. 2025. Southern Anthropocenes. London, England and New York: Routledge.
⸻, ed. Forthcoming. “The Challenge of Southeast Asian Cosmopolitics.” Special issue, Ethnos.
Jensen, Casper Bruun, and Jakkrit Sangkhamanee. 2024. “Rewilding Bangkok: Critical Zones and the Cosmoecology of Parks and Protests.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 48(4): 543–559.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13241.
Jobin, Paul, and Tzung-Wen Chen. 2023. “Toward an Upgrade of Gaia-Politics: A View from the East Asian Critical Zone.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 48(5): 1018–1041.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231191602.
Jobin, Paul, Ming-sho Ho, and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, eds. 2021. Environmental Movements and Politics of the Asian Anthropocene. Singapore: ISEAS.
Jory, Patrick. 2010. “Some Remarks on the Current State and Possible Future of Southeast Asian Studies.” Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 27–33.
Karib, Fathun, and Dana Listiana. 2025. “Can the Geo Speak? The Emergence of Southeast Asia Through Geological Assemblages.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 81–98.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3071.
Kaşdoğan, Duygu, and Angela Okune. 2023. “TRANSnationalizing STS: Places, Spaces, and Politics.” Engaging Science, Technology and Society 9(1): 50–62.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1577.
Keyes, Charles F. 1992. “A Conference at Wingspread and Rethinking Southeast Asian Studies.” In Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America, edited by Charles Hirschman, Charles F. Keyes and Karl Hutterer, 9–24. Ann Arbor, MI: Association of Asian Studies.
Lan, Goh Beng. 2010. “Southeast Asian Perspectives on Area Studies in a Global Age.” Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 45–61.
Laocharoenwong, Jiraporn. 2025. “Rethinking ‘Area’ Through Appetite for Hot-Fresh Meat and the Cross-Border Cattle Trade.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 135–144.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3055.
Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel, eds. 2020. Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Karlsruhe/Cambridge and London, England: ZKM and MIT Press.
Leach, Edmund R. 1961. Rethinking Anthropology. London, England: Athlone.
Marston, Sally A., John Paul Jones III, and Keith Woodward. 2005. “Human Geography Without Scale.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(4): 416–432.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x.
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC and London, England: Duke University Press.
Mol, Annemarie, and John Law. 1994. “Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology.” Social Studies of Science 24(4): 641–71.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402.
Omura, Keiichi, Grant Jun Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsuro Morita, eds. 2019. The World Multiple: Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds. London, England and New York: Routledge.
Pachuau, Joy L. K., and Willem van Schendel. 2022. Entangled Lives: Human-Animal-Plant Histories of the Eastern Himalayan Triangle. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009215480.
Padmanabhan, Martina. 2021. “Entangled Environments in Asia.” ASIEN: The German Journal on Contemporary Asia (160–161): 7–16.
https://doi.org/10.11588/asien.2021.160/161.20429.
Papadopoulos, Dimitris, María Puig de la Bellacasa, and Natasha Myers, eds. 2021. Reactivating Elements: Chemistry, Ecology, Practice. Durham, NC and London, England: Duke University Press.
Rafael, Vicente L. 1994. “The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States.” Social Text 41: 91–111.
https://doi.org/10.2307/466834.
Rafliana, Irina. 2025. “Tsunami as Method? Recognizing Tsunami Waves, Reconfiguring Areas.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(Issue): 55–69.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3073.
Rush, James R. 2018. Southeast Asia: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190248765.001.0001.
Saguin, Kristian Karlo. 2025. “Urban Areas as Entangled Areas in Southeast Asia.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 98–108.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3065.
Sangkhamanee, Jakkrit. 2025. “Atmospheric Zomia: Revisiting Upland Southeast Asia under Anthropocene Conditions.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 70–80.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3051.
Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2025. “Unsettled Area: Popular Territories of Blackness.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 109–119
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3053.
Siriwardane–de Zoysa, Rapti, and Muhammad Soufi Cahya Gemilang. 2025. “Buoyant Life: Floating Urbanities Adrift in the Archipelagic Imaginary.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 39–54.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3089.
Smith, Pamela H., ed. 2019. Entangled Itineraries: Materials, Practices, and Knowledges Across Eurasia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
Sundberg, Juanita. 2014. “Decolonizing Posthumanist Geographies.” Cultural Geographies 21(1): 33–47.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067.
Thufail, Fadjar I. 2016. “Area as Rhizome: Japanese Studies at the Indonesian Institute of Sciences.” PSDR Working paper series no. 1. Jakarta: Research Center for Regional Resources, Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
⸻. 2025. “Manifesto of the Durian: Smell and Area Studies.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 145–152.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3077.
Thufail, Fadjar I., and Virginia R. Dominguez. 2021. “How Anthropology Can Learn from ‘Asia as Method’: An Interview with Fadjar I. Thufail by Virginia Dominguez.” American Anthropologist 123(1): 177–178.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13530.
Tsing, Anna L. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
⸻. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, England: Princeton University Press.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere: Four Lectures Given in the Department of Anthropology, Cambridge University, February-March 1998. Manchester, Hau Master Class Series 1.
Whatmore, Sarah J. 2006. “Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography in and for a More-Than-Human World.” Cultural Geographies 13(4): 600–609.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa.
Winichakul, Thongchai. 1997. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
⸻. 2014. “Asian Studies Across Academies.” Journal of Asian Studies 73(4): 879–897.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814001065.
⸻. 2025. “Afterword: Meditation on Regions.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 153–161.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2025.3057.
Yarrow, Thomas, Matei Candea, Catherine Trundle, and Jo Cook, eds. 2015. Detachment: Essays on the Limits of Relational Thinking. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Zahirah S., Joseph R. Klein, Gillian Bogart, Kirsten Keller, Wayne Huang, and Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez. 2025. “Coastlines in Motion: A Sedimentary Rethinking of Southeast Asia.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 11(2): 20–38.
