Unsettled Area: Popular Territories of Blackness
Abstract
Popular territories is an increasingly favored designation of urban spaces designed and developed by an amalgam of poor, working, and lower-middle classes reflecting an intersection of home-grown practices and political sensibilities. While such territories appear increasingly riven by authoritarian populisms, religious conservatism and a systemic undermining of the economic relations that once supported intensive collaboration, they remain a locus through which new institutional arrangements are prefigured. From Brazil to Indonesia to Nigeria, they facilitate the gestation of new economic and political solidarities; where forms of affiliation and cooperation take shape, where statuses, identities, and functions are aligned in ways that do not necessarily line up with a conventional sense of neighborhoods or communities. This article examines the ways in which particular conceptions of Blackness might be mobilized to highlight how the entanglements of perspective, circulatory trajectories, and ways of life shape such territories. Blackness has long been appropriated as a mechanism of decanting, de-selection, and extraction, deployed to particularize specific territories and populations as objects of disposal, surplus or exoticization. The singularities of popular territories thus emanate from a constant tension between the generativity of their own self-produced histories and their enforced vulnerabilities to expropriations beyond their control. Blackness operates as a methodological lens suited to apprehend such “ontologies” in their doubleness.
References
Barua, Maan. 2021. “Infrastructure and Non-Human life: A Wider Ontology.” Progress in Human Geography 45(6): 1467–1489.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132521991220.
Cusicanqui, Sylvia Rivera. 2012. “Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization.” South Atlantic Quarterly 111(1): 95–109.
https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.
Farrugia, David. 2014. “Towards a Spatialised Youth Sociology: The Rural and the Urban in Times of Change.” Journal of Youth Studies 17(3): 293–307.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830700.
Fernandes, Bernardo M. 2005. “Movimentos Socioterritoriais e Movimentos Socioespaciais: Contribuição Teórica para Uma Leitura Geográfica Dos Movimentos Sociais” [Socioterritoiral Movements and Sociospatial Movements: Theoretical Contribution for a Geographical Reading of Social Movements]. Revista Nera 8(6): 14–34.
https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i6.1460.
Gordillo, Gastón. 2019. “The Metropolis: The Infrastructure of the Anthropocene.” In Infrastructure, Environment, and Life in the Anthropocene, edited by Kregg Hetherington, 66–94. Durham: Duke University Press.
Habibi, Muhtar, and Benny Hari Juliawan. 2018. “Creating Surplus Labour: Neo-Liberal Transformations and the Development of Relative Surplus Population in Indonesia.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(4): 649–670.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1429007.
Keil, Roger. 2018. “Extended Urbanization, ‘Disjunct Fragments’ and Global Suburbanisms.” Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space 36(3): 494–511.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817749594.
Kirksey, Eben. 2012. Freedom in Entangled Worlds: West Papua in the Architecture of Global Power. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kusumaryati, Veronika. 2020. “Adat Institutionalisation, the State and the Quest for Self-Determination in West Papua.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 21(1): 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670238.
Monte-Mór, Roberto Luís. 2018. “Urbanisation, Sustainability and Development: Contemporary Complexities and Diversities in the Production of Urban Space.” In Emerging Urban Spaces: A Planetary Perspective, edited by Phillipp Horn, Paola Alfaro d’Alençon, and Ana Claudia Duarte Cardoso, 201–215. Cham: Springer.
Neyrat, Frédéric. 2019. The Unconstructable Earth: An Ecology of Separation. Translated by Drew S. Burk. New York: Fordham University Press.
Rutherford, Jonathan, and Simon Marvin. 2023. “Urban Smart Microgrids: A Political Technology of Emergency-Normalcy.” Urban Geography 44(8): 1794–1815.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2126609.
Simondon, Gilbert. [1958] 2017. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Translated by Cécile Malaspina and John Rogove. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.
Slama, Martin, and Jenny Munro, eds. 2015. From ‘Stone-Age’ to ‘Real-Time’: Exploring Papuan Temporalities, Mobilities and Religiosities. Canberra: ANU Press.
Surya, Andrew P. 2019. The Kneel for Social Justice: Colin Kaepernick, Megan Rapinoe, and the Black Lives Matter Movement. Master’s thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Accessed October 27, 2025.
Timmer, Jaap. 2007. “Erring Decentralization and Elite Politics in Papua.” In Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia, edited by Henk Schulte Nordholt and Gerry van Klinken, 459–482. Leiden: KITLV Press.
Tirtosudarmo, Riwanto. 2018. The Politics of Migration in Indonesia and Beyond. Cham: Springer.
Wakefield, Stephanie. 2022. “Critical Urban Theory in the Anthropocene.” Urban Studies 59(5): 917–936.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211045523.
Wiig, Alan, and Jonathan Silver. 2019. “Turbulent Presents, Precarious Futures: Urbanization and the Deployment of Global Infrastructure.” Regional Studies 53(6): 912–923.
