Creative Dissent in India: Knowledge Swaraj and the People’s Health Movement
Abstract
There is an increasing interest among STS scholars to go beyond public understanding of science to look at the role of social movements in shaping alternate science and exploring the role of scientific dissent and the reconfiguration of the relations between scientists and citizens. The increasing popularity of citizen science that seeks to reengage the public in science needs to be situated within broader social movements that have argued for more conversations on science and democracy. This paper explores the idea of scientific dissent in India within a rich and vibrant tradition of People’s Science Movement(s). We suggest that the dominance of the technoscientific elite has been countered in part through creative dissent by citizens and scientists working together in envisioning knowledge futures. Specifically, a citizen’s manifesto—Knowledge Swaraj, is examined for its potential to present a frame for science in civil society rooted around the principles of plurality, sustainability, and justice that could reclaim the citizen’s autonomy or ‘self-rule’. Through the case study of the knowledge created by the People’s Health Movement (PHM) in India from 1976–1990, we show how creative dissent has enabled multiple conversations about science, medicine, and democracy that both critique dominant state and market narratives and presents an alternative through dissenting scientists.
References
Alvares, Claude Alphonso. 1992. Science, Development and Violence: The Revolt Against Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arnold, Dinesh. 2013. “Nehruvian Science and Postcolonial India.” Isis 104(2): 360–370.
https://doi.org/10.1086/670954.
ATPS. 2010. The African Manifesto for Science, Technology and Innovation, Nairobi: African Technology Policy Studies Network.
Bang, Abhay. 1978. “Editorial.” Medico Friend Circle Bulletin 33. September 1978.
http://www.mfcindia.org/mfcpdfs/MFC033.pdf.
Bang, Rani, and Mira Sadgopal. 1990. “Effect of Bhopal Disaster on Women’s Health: An Epidemic of Gynecological Diseases. Distorted Lives: Women’s Reproductive Health and Bhopal Disaster.” Part I. Medico Friend Circle. Pune, Medico Friend Circle.
Basu, Amrita. 1987. “Grassroots Movements and the State: Reflections on Radical Change in India.” Theory and Society 16(5): 647–674.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/657678.
Bhadra, Monamie. 2013. “Fighting Nuclear Energy, Fighting for India’s Democracy.” Science as Culture 22(2): 238–246.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786986.
Bryden, John, and Stig S. Gezelius. 2017. “Innovation as if people mattered: the ethics of innovation for sustainable development.” Innovation and Development 7(1): 101–118.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1281208.
Chikkatur, Ananth. 2010. “On Being a Technology Policy Analyst.” Economic and Political Weekly 45(16): 33–35.
Chatterjee, Patralekha. 2011. “Seeing Healthcare as a Human Right in India.” The Lancet 377(9761): 195–196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60031-7.
Chorev, Nitsan. 2012. The World Health Organization Between North and South. Cornell University Press.
Dash, Biswanath. 2020. “Science, State and Meteorology in India.” Dialogue—Science, Scientists, and Society 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.29195/DSSS.03.01.0026.
Delborne, Jason. 2008. “Transgenes and Transgressions: Scientific Dissent as Heterogeneous Practice.” Social Studies of Science 38(4): 509–541.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708089716.
Dumoulin, Kervran D., Mina Kleiche-Dray, and Mathieu Quet. 2018. “Going South. How STS Could Think Science in and with the South?” Tapuya, Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 280–305.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1550186.
Epstein, Steven. 1998. Impure Science. AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press.
Fortun, Kim. 2001. Advocacy After Bhopal. Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gibbons, Michael. 1999. “Science’s New Social Contract with Society.” Nature 402, C81–C84.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576.
Guha, Ram. 1988. “The Alternative Science Movement: An Interim Assessment.” Lokayan Bulletin 6(3): 7–25.
Hess, David J. 2018. “The Anti-Dam Movement in Brazil: Expertise and Design Conflicts in an Industrial Transition Movement.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 256–279.
⸻. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Jaffry, Anwar, Mahesh Rangarajan, B. Ekbal, and K. P. Kannan, 1983. “Towards a People’s Science Movement.” Economic and Political Weekly 372–376.
Jain, Ashok. 2002. “Networks of Science and Technology in India: The Elite and the Subaltern Streams.” AI and Society 16: 4–20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022694.
KICS. 2011. “Knowledge Swaraj: An Indian Manifesto on Science and Technology.” Knowledge in Civil Society (KICS). Hyderabad, India.
http://kicsforum.in/kics/kicsmatters/Knowledge-swaraj-an-Indian-S&T-manifesto.pdf.
Kimura, Aya H. 2021. “Citizen Science and Social Movements: A Case of Participatory Monitoring of Genetically Modified Crops in Japan.” The Sociological Review 69(3): 580–602.
⸻, and Kinchy, Abby. 2016. “Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 331–361.
https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.99.
Krishna, Venni V. 1997. “Science, Technology and Counter Hegemony—Some Reflections on the Contemporary Science Movements in India.” In Science and Technology in a Developing World, edited by Terry Shinn, Jack Spaapen, Venni Krishna. 375–411. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
⸻. 2021. “India @ 75: Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development.” Science, Technology and Society 27(1): 113–146.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218211047029.
Martin, Brian. 1993. “The Critique of Science Becomes Academic.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18(2): 247–259.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800208.
⸻. 2004. “Dissent and Heresy in Medicine: Models, Methods, and Strategies.” Social Science & Medicine 58(4): 713–725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00223-5.
⸻. 2014. Controversy Manual. Irene Publishing, Sweden.
Medico Friend Circle. 1985. “Aftermath of Bhopal Disaster: An Epidemiological and Socio-Medical Survey.” Economic and Political Weekly 20(48): 2109–2112.
Medico Friend Circle. 2002. “Gujarat Carnage and the Health Services: A Public Health Disaster.” Report of an Investigation May 2002.
https://www.onlinevolunteers.org/gujarat/reports/mfc-report.htm.
Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
⸻, Daniel Lee Kleinman, David Hess, and Scott Frickel. 2011. “Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach.” Theory and Society 40(5): 505–532.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9147-3.
Nanda, Meera. 1998. Reclaiming Modern Science for Third World Progressive Social Movements, Economic and Political Weekly. April 18: 915–922.
⸻. 2003. Prophets Facing Backward. Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India. New Brunswick & London: Rutgers University Press.
Nandy, Ashis, ed. 1988. Science, Hegemony and Violence. Delhi: Oxford University Press
Ottinger, Gwen. 2016. “Social Movement-Based Citizen Science.” In The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, edited by Darlene Cavalier and Eric Kennedy. Tempe: Arizona State University Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes. 89–103.
Prasad, Shambu C. 2001. “Towards an Understanding of Gandhi’s Views on Science.” Economic and Political Weekly. 36(39): 3721–3732.
⸻. 2002. “Exploring Gandhian Science: A Case Study of the Khadi Movement.” Doctoral Dissertation. Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
⸻. 2005. “Science and Technology in Civil Society: The Innovation Trajectory of Spirulina Algal Technology.” Economic and Political Weekly 40: 4363–4372.
⸻. 2014a. “Creative Dissent: Linking Vulnerability and Knowledge in India.” In Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and Governance, edited by Anique Hommels, Jess Mesman and Wiebe Bijker. Boston: MIT Press. 135–154.
⸻. 2014b. “Revisiting Science’s Social Contract.” Seminar 654: 55–61.
⸻. 2016. “Innovating at the Margins: The System of Rice Intensification in India and Transformative Social Innovation.” Ecology and Society 21(4):7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08718-210407
Quartz, Julia. 2010. “Creative Dissent with Technoscience in India: The Case of Non‐Pesticidal Management (NPM) in Andhra Pradesh.” International Journal of Technology and Development Studies 1(1): 55‐92.
Quet, Mathieu. 2014. “Science to the People! (and Experimental Politics): Searching for the Roots of Participatory Discourse in Science and Technology in the 1970s in France.” Public Understanding of Science 23(6):628–645.
Raina, Rajeswari, ed. 2015. Science, Technology and Development in India: Encountering Values. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
Rajan, Ravi S. 2005. “Science, State and Violence: An Indian Critique Reconsidered.” Science as Culture 14(3):265–281.
Rajan, Vithal. 1977. “Community Health in China.” MFC Bulletin 22: 1.
Sahoo, S., and B. K. Pattnaik, 2012. “Understanding People’s Science Movement in India: From the Vantage of Social Movement Perspective.” Sociology of Science and Technology 3(4):8–72.
Sathyamala, C. 1996. “Reproductive Health Consequences of Bhopal Gas Leak: Fertility and Gynaecological Disorders.” Economic and Political Weekly 31(1): 43–57.
Schiebinger, Londa. 1999. “Gender Studies of STS: A Look Toward the Future.” Science, Technology and Society 4(1): 95–106.
Seshadri, C. V., and Shiv Visvanathan. 2002. “‘The Laboratory and the World’: Conversations with C. V. Seshadri.” Economic and Political Weekly 37(22): 2163–2170.
Sharma, Dhirendra. 1976. “Growth and Failures of India’s Science Policy.” Economic and Political Weekly 11(51): 1969–71.
https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400107.
Sharma, Manoj, and Gayatri Bhatia. 1996. “The Voluntary Community Health Movement in India: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.” Journal of Community Health 21(6): 453–464.
STEPS. 2010. Innovation, Sustainability, Development: A New Manifesto Brighton: STEPS-Centre.
Stirling, Andy. 2009. “Direction, Distribution and Diversity! Pluralising Progress in Innovation, Sustainability and Development.” STEPS Working Paper 32. Brighton: STEPS Centre.
Strasser, Bruno, and Muki Haklay. 2018a. “Citizen Science: Expertise, Democracy and Public Participation.” Report for Swiss Science Council.
https://www.swir.ch/images/stories/pdf/en/SWR_PolicyAnalysis_CitizenScience_INHALT_EN_excerpt.pdf.
⸻, Jérôme Baudry, Dana Mahr, Gabriela Sanchez, and Elise Tancoigne. 2018b. “Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science & Technology Studies 32: 52–76.
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425.
Shiva, Vandana. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics (Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network).
Shukla, Abhay, and Anant A. Phadke. 1999. “Health Movements in India.” Health Action 12(12): 6-9.
Upadhyaya, Venus. 2014. Traditional Indian Doctors Seek Government Recognition for their Practices.
Varma, Roli. 2001. “People’s Science Movements and Science Wars?” Economic and Political Weekly 36(52): 4796–4802.
Varughese, Shiju S. 2020. “Expertise at the ‘Deliberative Turn’: Multiple Publics and the Social Distribution of Technoscientific Expertise.” Dialogue—Science, Scientists, and Society 3(1).
Visvanathan, Shiv. 1997. A Carnival for Science: Essays on Science, Technology, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
⸻. 2006. “Alternative Science.” Theory, Culture & Society 23(2–3): 164–169.
Werskey, Gary. 2007. “The Marxist Critique of Capitalist Science: A History in Three Movements?” Science as Culture 16(4): 397–461.
Williams, Logan. D. A. 2019. Eradicating Blindness. Global Health Innovation from South Asia. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ziman, John. 2007. “Science in Civil Society.” Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Copyright (c) 2022 Shambu C. Prasad, Mathieu Quet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.
