The Empowering Virtues of Citizen Science: Claiming Clean Air in Brussels


The governance and monitoring of environmental hazards—and of air pollution in particular—is often dominated by technical expertise and scientific knowledge. Approaches of this kind remove the issue from the public debate and democratic deliberation: citizens are de facto excluded from related decision-making and their knowledge about the problem is barely taken into account. This article explores the potential and limits of citizen science to challenge unfair frameworks of environmental monitoring and governance, inasmuch as it empowers citizens, by enabling three critical processes: gaining knowledge, gaining epistemic recognition, and building transdisciplinary coalitions. Empirically, this study is based on AirCasting Brussels, a Citizen Science project that unrolled in Brussels in the context of a mobilization for cleaner air to which it contributed. The analysis shows that citizen science has increased the ability of participating communities to scrutinize air pollution policy and to contribute to and influence public discussion about it, albeit with certain limits. Overall, as a counterpart to their fundamental right to participate in democracy, Citizen Science proves effective to strengthen citizens’ capabilities to do so in a meaningful manner.

Author Biography

Nicola da Schio, Cosmopolis Centre for Urban Research (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)


Aircasting. [Undated]. App, November 2, 2019.

Allen, Barbara L. 2018. “Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43(6): 947–71.

Ascher, William, Toddi Steelman, and Robert Healy. 2010. “Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Re-Imagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics.” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bäckstrand, Karin. 2011. “Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.” In The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader, edited by Sandra Harding. [Electronic]: Duke University Press.

Boudia, Soraya, and Nathalie Jas. 2014. “The Greatness and Misery of Science in a Toxic World.” In Powerless Science?: Science and Politics in a Toxic World. New York: Berghahn Books.

Brown, Phil. 2007. Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bruxelles Environnement. 2020. L’environnement: état des lieux—espaces verts et biodiversité. [The environment: state of play—green spaces and biodiversity]. Accessed July 22, 2020.

Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain—essai sur la démocratie technique. [Acting in an uncertain world—an essay on technical democracy]. La Couleur des Idées. Paris: Seuil.

Certomà, Chiara, Filippo Corsini, and Francesco Rizzi. 2015. “Crowdsourcing Urban Sustainability. Data, People and Technologies in Participatory Governance.” Futures 74(November): 93–106.

Chemin, Lievin, Nicola da Schio, and Tim Cassiers. 2019. Citizen Science: Collective Knowledge Empowers. Brussels: BRAL & Cosmopolis. Accessed March 3, 2022. 2021. ClientEarth and Brussels Residents Win Five-Year Legal Battle for Clean Air. Press release, 29 January 2021. Accessed March 2, 2022.

Da Schio, Nicola. 2020. “Self-Portraits of Personal Exposure to Air Pollution: On Where and When People Are Exposed, and On Why It Is Difficult to Avoid.” Human Ecology 48: 465–479.

⸻, Bas de Geus, and Catherine Bouland. 2017. “A Brief Guide to the Air of Brussels.” Brussels Centre Observatory Portfolio #2, Accessed November 21, 2017.

Davies, Thom, and Alice Mah, eds. 2020. Toxic Truths: Environmental Justice and Citizen Science in a Post-Truth Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

De Standaard. 2018. “Wie fijn stof meet, heeft invloed” [Those who measure fine dust have an influence]. De Standaard. February 28, 2018. Accessed March 2, 2022.

Dhillon, Carla May. 2017. “Using Citizen Science in Environmental Justice: Participation and Decision-Making in a Southern California Waste Facility Siting Conflict.” Local Environment 22(12): 1479–96.

Dons, Evi, Sam De Craemer, Huib Huyse, Jordy Vercauteren, et al. 2020. “Measuring and Modelling Exposure to Air Pollution with Citizen Science: The CurieuzeNeuzen Project.” ISEE Conference Abstracts: Environmental Health Perspectives.

European Environment Agency. 2019. “Assessing Air Quality Through Citizen Science.” European Environment Agency Report No. 19/2019. Accessed June 30, 2021.

Frickel, Scott, Sahra Gibbon, Jeff Howard, Joanna Kempner, et al. 2010. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(4): 444–73.

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gabrys, Jennifer. 2017. “Citizen Sensing, Air Pollution and Fracking: From ‘Caring about Your Air’ to Speculative Practices of Evidencing Harm.” The Sociological Review 65(2_suppl.): 172–92.

⸻, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. “Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories.” Big Data & Society 3(2): 1-14.

Haklay, Muki. 2013. “Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation.” In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, edited by Daniel Sui, Sarah Elwood, and Michael Goodchild. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

⸻, and Louise Francis. 2017. “Participatory GIS and Community-Based Citizen Science for Environmental Justice Action.” In The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice, edited by Ryan Holifield, Jayajit Chakraborty, and Gordon Walker. London: Routledge. 297–308.

Heimbinder, Michael, and Alex Besser. 2014. “AirBeam Technical Specifications, Operation & Performance.” Accessed May 7, 2018. Undated. Belgian Interregional Environment Agency (IRCEL—CELINE). Accessed March 2, 2022.

Jalbert, Kirk, and Abby J. Kinchy. 2016. “Sense and Influence: Environmental Monitoring Tools and the Power of Citizen Science.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(3): 379–97.

Kasperowski, Dick, and Christopher Kullenberg. 2019. “The Many Modes of Citizen Science.” Science & Technology Studies 32(2): 2–7.

Kenis, Anneleen, and Matthias Lievens. 2014. “Searching for “the Political” in Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics 23(4): 531–48.

Kimura, Aya H., and Abby Kinchy. 2016. “Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 331–61.

Liboiron, Max. 2017. “Compromised Agency: The Case of BabyLegs.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 499–527.

Liévanos, Raoul S., Jonathan K. London, and Julie Sze. 2011. “Uneven Transformations and Environmental Justice: Regulatory Science, Street Science, and Pesticide Regulation in California.” In Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement. The MIT Press Direct.

Matz, Jacob Robert, Sara Wylie, and Jill Kriesky. 2017. “Participatory Air Monitoring in the Midst of Uncertainty: Residents’ Experiences with the Speck Sensor.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 464–98.

Nadal, Carine. 2008. “Pursuing Substantive Environmental Justice: The Aarhus Convention as a Pillar of Empowerment.” Environmental Law Review 10(1): 28–45.

Newig, Jens, and Eva Kvarda. 2012. “Participation in Environmental Governance: Legitimate and Effective?” In Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ottinger, Gwen. 2010a. “Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(2): 244–70.

⸻. 2010b. “Constructing Empowerment through Interpretations of Environmental Surveillance Data.” Surveillance & Society 8(2): 221–34.

⸻. 2013. “Changing Knowledge, Local Knowledge, and Knowledge Gaps: STS Insights into Procedural Justice.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38(2): 250–70.

⸻. 2016. “Social Movement-Based Citizen Science.” In The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, edited by Darlene Cavalier and Eric B. Kennedy. 89–103. Tempe, AZ and Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy, & Outcomes.

⸻. 2017a. “Making Sense of Citizen Science: Stories as a Hermeneutic Resource.” Energy Research & Social Science, 31(September): 41–49.

⸻. 2017b. “Opening Black Boxes.” In The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice, edited by Ryan Holifield, Jayajit Chakraborty, and Gordon Walker. London: Routledge. 89–100.

Paddon, Natalie, Idil Mussa, Dalal Kheder, and Andrea Smith. 2013. Can Citizen Science Activism Come to the Rescue? 26 April 2013. Accessed October 28, 2019.

Paumard, Leo, Catherine Bouland, Lievin Chemin, and Tim Cassiers. 2017. “Luchtkwaliteit. Weten Om Te Ageren.” [Air Pollution, Knowing, in Order to Act] Accessed June 6, 2020. Brussels: BRAL & ULB.

Rabeharisoa, Vololona, Tiago Moreira, and Madeleine Akrich. 2014. “Evidence-Based Activism: Patients’, Users’ and Activists’ Groups in Knowledge Society.” BioSocieties 9(2): 111–28.

Region De Bruxelles-Capitale. 2008. Arrêté du Gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale déterminant les mesures d’urgence en vue de prévenir les pics de pollution atmosphérique par les micro-particules et les dioxydes d’azote. [Decree of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region determining the emergency measures to prevent air pollution peaks by micro-particles and nitrogen dioxides] November 27, 2008. Accessed March 3, 2022.

Rowlands, Jo. 1995. “Empowerment Examined.” Development in Practice 5(2): 101–7.

Science Communication Unit-University of West England. 2013. “In-Depth Report: Environmental Citizen Science.” Science for Environment Policy 9. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment. Accessed July 7, 2016.

Stilgoe, Jack. 2009. Citizen Scientists: Reconnecting Science with Civil Society. London: Demos. Accessed March 3, 2022.

US EPA, ORD. Undated. “Evaluation of Emerging Air Pollution Sensor Performance.” US EPA. Accessed July 5, 2018.

Walker, Gordon. 2012. Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. London: Routledge.

Whitehead, Mark. 2009. State, Science and the Skies: Governmentalities of the British Atmosphere. Chichester, UK; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

World Health Organisation (WHO). 2016. Ambient (Outdoor) Air Quality and Health. Fact Sheet No. 313(September). Accessed May 26, 2017.

Wylie, Sara, Nick Shapiro, and Max Liboiron. 2017a. “Making and Doing Politics Through Grassroots Scientific Research on the Energy and Petrochemical Industries.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 393–425.

⸻, Elisabeth Wilder, Lourdes Vera, Deborah Thomas, and Megan McLaughlin. 2017b. “Materializing Exposure: Developing an Indexical Method to Visualize Health Hazards Related to Fossil Fuel Extraction.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 426–63.

29 May 2022
Original Research Articles