Maneuvering through a Changing Funding Terrain: Biomedical University Scientists in Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
The mechanisms of research funding are in flux across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. In Denmark the research system has experienced an increase in the concentration of research funding on individual researchers and topic areas. This article documents such concentration patterns in biomedical research and applies a case study methodology to explore some of its consequences. The study contrasts the markedly different funding environments of two sets of biomedical researchers at the same public university. One set of scientists has benefited significantly from working in specialized research centers sponsored by private funds. The other, located at a conventional university department has been adversely affected by the changing funding logic of the Danish research system. We compare the two sets of researchers with regard to: 1) how they perceive their funding conditions to have changed in recent times, 2) what coping strategies they rely on, and 3) how they perceive this to impact their “problem choice.” Our analysis shows how scientists, as a consequence of rising competition over funding and growing resource concentration on fewer research specialties (of particular interest to private funders), perceive considerable pressure to adapt their research activities. The perceived impact however differs substantially across informants.
Aagaard, Kaare. 2011. “Kampen om Basismidlerne. Historisk institutionel analyse af basisbevillingsmodellens udvikling på universitetsområdet i Danmark.” [The Struggle over Core Funding. A Historical Institutional Analysis of the Development of the Core Funding Model for Universities in Denmark]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Political Science. Aarhus University.
⸻. 2016. “Danmark: Fald i Offentlige Forskningsinvesteringer, men Stigninger i Bevillinger fra Private Fonde.” Forskningspolitikk. Fagbladet for Forskning, Høyere Utdanning og Innovasjon [Denmark: Decline in Public Research Investments but Rise in Private Funding. Research Policy. Periodical for Research, Higher Education and Innovation], 1: 30–31.
⸻. 2017. “The Evolution of a National Research Funding System: Transformative Change Through Layering and Displacement.” Minerva 55(3): 279–297.
Aagaard, Kaare, Alexander Kladakis, and Mathias W. Nielsen. 2020. “Concentration or Dispersal of Research Funding?” Quantitative Science Studies 1(1): 117–149.
Aagaard, Kaare, Philippe Mongeon, Irene Ramos-Vielba, and Duncan A. Thomas. 2021. “Getting to the Bottom of Research Funding: Acknowledging the Complexity of Funding Dynamics.” PLOS One 16(5): 1–25.
Albert, Mathieu, and Daniel L. Kleinman. 2011. “Bringing Pierre Bourdieu to Science and Technology Studies.” Minerva 49(3): 263–273.
Andras, Peter. 2011. “Research: Metrics, Quality, and Management Implications.” Research Evaluation 20(2): 90–106.
Bol, Thijs, Mathijs de Vaan, and Arnout van de Rijt. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Science Funding.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 115(19): 4887–4890.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason.” Social Science Information 14(6): 19–47.
⸻. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
⸻. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press.
⸻. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bühlmann, Felix, Thomas David, and André Mach. 2013. “Cosmopolitan Capital and the Internationalization of the Field of Business Elites: Evidence from the Swiss Case.” Cultural Sociology 7(2): 211–229.
Calhoun, Craig. 2006. “The University and the Public Good.” Thesis Eleven 84(1): 7–43.
Cooper, Mark H. 2009. “Commercialization of the University and Problem Choice by Academic Biological Scientists.” Science, Technology & Human Values 34(5): 629–653.
Danmarks Forsknings—og Innovationspolitiske Råd (DFIR). Bargmann, Madsen Emil, and Kaare Aagaard. 2020. “Fordeling af Forskningsbevillinger i Danmark—Fordelingen af udvalgte konkurrenceudsatte forskningsmidler på hovedområder og discipliner, 2004-2016.” [Distribution of Research Funding in Denmark—Distribution of selected competitive research grants on main areas and disciplines, 2004-2016]. Report. Accessed August 24, 2022.
Danske Universiteter. [Universities Denmark]. 2012-2017. Universiteternes Statistiske Beredskab [Statistical Reserve for Universities in Denmark]. Statistics. Accessed February 4, 2019. Det Statistiske Beredskab—Danske Universiteter (dkuni.dk). https://dkuni.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/du_tal_om_danske_universiteter_2016.pdf.
⸻. 2016. Tal om de danske universiteter [Key Statistics on Danish Universities]. København. Report. Accessed February 4, 2019.
Degn, Lise. 2018. “På Vej mod et nyt Dansk Finansieringslandskab?” Forskningspolitikk. Fagbladet for forskning, høyere utdanning og innovasjon [Towards a New Danish Funding Terrain. Research Policy. Periodical for Research, Higher Education and Innovation] 4: 2–23.
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission), TNS Qual+, Karamat Ali, Danique, Theo Schuyt, et al. 2015. “EUFORI study: European Foundations for Research and Innovation: Synthesis Report.” European Commission.
Franssen, Thomas, Wout Scholten, Laurens K. Hessels, and Sarah de Rijcke. 2018. “The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation: Comparing Institutional Affordances and Constraints of Different Types of Research Funding.” Minerva 56(1): 11–33.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1978. “Problem Retention and Problem Change in Science.” Sociological Inquiry 48(3–4): 96–115.
⸻. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.
Gläser, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. 2016. “Governing Science: How Science Policy Shapes Research Content.” European Journal of Sociology 57(1): 117–168.
Gläser, Jochen, and Kathia S. Velarde. 2018. “Changing Funding Arrangements and the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Minerva 56: 1–10.
Heinze, Thomas. 2008. “How to Sponsor Ground-Breaking Research: A Comparison of Funding Schemes.” Science and Public Policy 35(5): 302–318.
Heinze, Thomas, Philip Shapira, Juan D. Rogers, and Jacqueline M. Senker. 2009. “Organizational and Institutional Influences on Creativity in Scientific Research.” Research Policy 38(4): 610–623.
Hellström, Tomas, and Christina Hellström. 2020. “Cross-Sectoral Mobility Funding and the Challenge of Immersion: The Case of SSH”’ Minerva 58: 389–407.
Hessels, Laurens K., John Grin, Ruud E. H. M. Smits, Harro Matt, et al. 2011. “The Effects of a Changing Institutional Environment on Academic Research Practices: Three Cases from Agricultural Science.” Science and Public Policy 38(7): 555–568.
Hicks, Diana, and J. Sylvan Katz. 2011. “Equity and Excellence in Research Funding.” Minerva 49(2): 137–151.
Hoenig, Barbara. 2017. Europe’s New Scientific Elite: Social Mechanisms of Science in the European Research Area. London: Routledge.
Hove, Kjetil H. 2020. “Does the Type of Funding Influence Research Results—and Do Researchers Influence Funders?” Prometheus 36(2): 153–172.
Kundu, Oishee, and Nicholas E. Matthews. 2019. “The Role of Charitable Funding in University Research.” Science and Public Policy 46(4): 611–619.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Second Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Laudel, Grit. 2006a. “The Art of Getting Funded: How Scientists Adapt to Their Funding Conditions.” Science and Public Policy 33(7): 489–504.
⸻. 2006b. “The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds.” Higher Education 52(3): 375–403.
Laudel, Grit, and Jochen Gläser. 2007. “Interviewing Scientists.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 3(2): 91-111.
⸻. 2014. “Beyond Breakthrough Research: Epistemic Properties of Research and Their Consequences for Research Funding.” Research Policy 43(7): 1204–1216.
Leisyte, Liudvika. 2007. “University Governance and Academic Research: Case Studies of Research Units in Dutch and English Universities.” PhD Dissertation. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences. University of Twente. Accessed February 4, 2019.
Leisyte, Liudvika, and Jay R. Dee. 2012. “Understanding Academic Work in a Changing Institutional Environment. Faculty Autonomy, Productivity and Identity in Europe and the United States.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by John C. Smart, and Michael B. Paulsen. Volume 27. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lepori, Benedetto, Peter van den Besselaar, Michael Dinges, Barend van der Meulen, et al. 2007. “Indicators for Comparative Analysis of Public Project Funding: Concepts, Implementation and Evaluation.” Research Evaluation 16(4): 243–255.
Lund, Anker B., and Christian E. Berg. 2016. Dansk fondshistorie. [History of Danish Foundations]. Copenhagen: Djøf Forlag.
Luukkonen, Terttu, and Duncan A. Thomas. 2016. “The ‘Negotiated Space’ of University Researchers’ Pursuit of a Research Agenda.” Minerva 54(1): 99–127.
Madsen, Emil B., Kaare Aagaard. 2020a. “Concentration of Danish Research Funding on Individual Researchers and Research Topics: Patterns and Potential Drivers.” Quantitative Science Studies 1(3): 1159–1181.
⸻. 2020b. “Fordeling af Forskningsbevillinger i Danmark—Fordelingen af Udvalgte Konkurrenceudsatte Forskningsmidler på Hovedområder og Discipliner, 2004-2016.” [Distribution of Research Funding in Denmark—Distribution of Selected Competitive Research Grants on Main Areas and Disciplines, 2004-2016]. Danmarks Forsknings—og Innovationspolitiske Råd (DFIR). Report. Accessed August 24, 2022.
McGuire, Wendy. 2016. “Cross-Field Effects of Science Policy on the Biosciences: Using Bourdieu’s Relational Methodology to Understand Change.” Minerva 54(3): 325–351.
Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159(3810): 56–63.
Morris, Norma. 2003. “Academic Researchers as ‘Agents’ of Science Policy.” Science and Public Policy 30(5): 359–370.
Morris, Norma, and Arie Rip. 2006. “Scientists’ Coping Strategies in an Evolving Research System: The Case of Life Scientists in the UK.” Science and Public Policy 33(4): 253–263.
Mulkay, Michael J., and David O. Edge. 1973. “Cognitive, Technical and Social Factors in the Growth of Radio Astronomy.” Social Science Information 12(6): 25–61.
OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. “Frascati Manual.” Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Accessed August 14, 2022.
⸻. 2019. “Gross Domestic Spending on Research and Development (R&D).” Indicator document. Accessed February 4, 2019.
Rip, Arie. 1994. “The Republic of Science in the 1990s.” Higher Education 28(1): 3–23.
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2016. “Saving Science.” The New Atlantis 49: 4–40.
Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Statistics Denmark. 1911–2011. “Research and Development.” Online Statistics. Searched for 2011–2017. Accessed February 4, 2019. Statistics Denmark Website.
Uddannelses-og Forskningsministeriet. 2016. Private Fonde. En kortlægning af bidraget til dansk forskning, innovation og videregående uddannelse. København. [Private Foundations – A Mapping of the Contribution to Danish Research, Innovation and Higher Education]. Report. Accessed February 4, 2019.
⸻. 2018. Forskningsbarometer [Research Barometer]. København. Report. Accessed February 4, 2019.
Vallas, Steven P., and Daniel L. Kleinman. 2008. “Contradiction, Convergence and the Knowledge Economy: The Confluence of Academic and Commercial Biotechnology.” Socio-Economic Review 6(2): 283–311.
Wang, Jian, You-Na Lee, and John P. Walsh. 2018. “Funding Model and Creativity in Science: Competitive versus Block Funding and Status Contingency Effects.” Research Policy 47(6): 1070–1083.
Whitley, Richard, Jochen Gläser, and Grit Laudel. 2018. “The Impact of Changing Funding and Authority Relationships on Scientific Innovations.” Minerva 56(1): 109–134.
Ziman, John M. 1981. “What Are the Options? Social Determinants of Personal Research Plants.” Minerva 19: 1–42.
⸻. 1987. “The Problem of ‘Problem Choice.’” Minerva 25(1/2): 92–106.
⸻. 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1978. “Theory Choice and Problem Choice in Science.” Sociological Inquiry 48(3–4): 65–95.
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Kladakis, Kaare Aagaard, Janus Hansen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work, and agree to license them under one of the following Creative Commons licenses CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, and refer to the individual article footer for specific licensing data. Please read our open access policy for more information.