Teaching and Learning with Situated Data: Socio-Technical Pedagogy and Reform at the Community Data Clinic and Biological Computer Lab
Abstract
This paper reviews how situated data methods were used to critically engage students in sociotechnical case studies drawn from campus history and archives in courses developed under the Community Data Clinic and the Biological Computer Lab at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In contrast to conventional data practices—that have long been critiqued by feminist, critical race and decolonial STS scholars for conditioning researchers to adopt a disembodied, de-gendered, -raced and -classed “God’s eye view from nowhere” (Haraway 1988) in order to project claims to objectivity and universality, situated data practices underscore the need for acknowledging the kinds of epistemic violence that a reproduction of “seeing from nowhere” expands, including through accelerating trends in datafication on and off university campuses. Pedagogy around situated data cultivates instead more accountable research practices through acknowledging the specificity of data that researchers collect and the necessary partiality of any researcher’s ability to see and know. As I review here, too, situated data methods offer valuable lessons for teachers and scholars in critical data and STS fields working to preserve pluralist, human-centered approaches to data in the face of accelerating campus investments in industry-centered data science programs. Indeed, at a time when STS and critical data scholars are witnessing the rapid growth of data science programs on campuses that train students to uncritically meet the profit-driven demands of datafication driven largely by Big Tech companies, the adoption of situated data methods to revisit sociotechnical practice and STS’ own overlooked histories of innovation in intersection with counter-cultural politics in the US uncovers the richness of alternative resources. Such histories can highlight how sociotechnical change and infrastructural transformation are more than just the domain of industry sectors or elite knowledge institutions, especially when they involve justice-based reforms.
References
Anderson, Bethany. 2016. Heinz von Foerster and The Biological Computer Laboratory: A Cybernetics Odyssey. University of Illinois Archives blog. December 6, 2016. Modified February 27, 2023.
https://archives.library.illinois.edu/blog/heinz-von-foerster-and-the-bcl/.
Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete,” Wired Magazine, June 23, 2008.
https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
Anderson, Jane, and Kimberly Christen. 2019. “Decolonizing Attribution: Traditions of Exclusion.” Journal of Radical Librarianship 5: 113–152.
Asaro, Peter. 2007. “Heinz von Foerster and the Bio-Computing Movements of the 1960s.” In An unfinished revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory/BCL 1958–1976, edited by Albert Müller and Karl H. Müller. Vienna: Edition Echoraum.
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bowker, Geoffrey, and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Brown, Steven E. 2008. “Breaking Barriers: The Pioneering Disability Students Services Program at the University of Illinois: 1948–1960.” In The History of Discrimination in US Education, edited by Eileen H. Tamura, 165–192. New York: Palgrave McMillian.
Chan, Anita Say. 2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
⸻. [forthcoming]. Refusing Predatory Data: Dissident Futures from Eugenics to Big Tech. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Chan, Anita, and Patricia Garcia. [forthcoming]. “Data and Situated Accountability.” In The SAGE Handbook of Data and Society: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Critical Data Studies, edited by Tommaso Venturini, Amelia Acker, Jean-Cristophe Plantin, and Tone Walford. London: Sage Publishers.
Christen, Kimberly. 2018. “Relationships not Records: Digital Heritage and the Ethics of Sharing Indigenous Knowledge Online.” In Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, edited by Jentery Sayers. Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2021. Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cifor, Marika, Patricia Garcia, T. L. Cowan, Jasmine Rault et al. 2019. Feminist Data Manifest-No. Accessed September 13. 2024.
Clardy, Brian K. 2002. The Management of Dissent: Responses to the Post Kent State Protests at Seven Public Universities in Illinois. University Press of America: Lanham, MD.
Clarke, Bruce. 2012. “From Information to Cognition: The Systems Counterculture, Heinz von Foerster’s Pedagogy, and Second-Order Cybernetics.” Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 196–207.
https://constructivist.info/7/3/196.
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cutcliffe, Stephen H. 1987. “Technology Studies and the Liberal Arts at Lehigh University.” Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 7(1–2): 42–48.
https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768700700109.
⸻. 1990. “The STS Curriculum: What Have We Learned in Twenty Years?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15(3): 360–372.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500305.
d’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Educational Reform Committee. 1968. “To the University with Love: An Educational Reform Manifesto—University of Illinois 1968.” STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), modified August 8, 2021. Accessed October 4, 2024.
Freire, Paolo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing.
Geiger, Roger. 2015. The History of American Higher Education: Learning and Culture from the Founding to World War II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gitelman, Lisa. 2013. “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
Hartin, Tim, Kaitlin Southworth, and Alison Davis Wood. 2016. “The Game Changer.” Illinois’ Office of Public Affairs and the Division of Intercollegiate Athletics, September 17, 2016. Documentary, 29 min., 16 sec.
https://mediaspace.illinois.edu/media/t/1_y35goe2n/32606871.
Heitowit, Ezra D., Janet Epstein, and Gerald Steinberg. 1976. “Science, Technology, and Society: A Guide to the Field. Directory of Teaching, Research, and Resources in the U.S.” Program on Science, Technology, and Society, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), July 10, 2023. Accessed October 4, 2024. https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/science-technology-and-society-guide-field-directory-teaching-research-and-resources-us-3.
Hutchinson, Jamie. 2008. “Nerve Center of the Cybernetic World: Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory.” Accessed June 29, 2021. No longer available.
http://bcl.ece.illinois.edu/hutchinson/ index.htm.
Kennedy, Patrick. 1991. “Reactions Against the Vietnam War and Military-Related Targets on Campus: The University of Illinois as a Case Study, 1965–1972.” Illinois Historical Journal 84(2): 101-118.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40192359.
Kline, Ronald R. 2015. The Cybernetics Moment: Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1353/book.40478.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2008. “Cybernetics’s Reflexive Turns.” Cybernetics and Human Knowing 15(3–4): 173–184.
Mead, Margaret. 1968. “Cybernetics of Cybernetics.” In Purposive Systems, edited by Heinz von Foerster, John D. White, Larry J. Peterson and John K. Russell, 1–11. New York: Spartan Books.
Mercer, Lisa E., and Terresa Moses. 2019. “Identifying Racialized Design to Cultivate a Culture of Awareness in Design.” The Design Journal 22(1): 1399–1407.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594965.
Metz, Michael V. 2019. Radicals in the Heartland: The 1960s Student Protest Movement at the University of Illinois. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Müller, Albert, and Karl H. Müller, eds. 2007. An Unfinished Revolution? Heinz von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory / BCL 1958–1976. Vienna: edition echoraum.
Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
⸻. 2014. “Teaching Trayvon: Race, Media, and the Politics of Spectacle.” The Black Scholar 44(1): 12–29.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2014.11641209.
Prutzer, Ned. 2017. The Biological Computer Laboratory. Accessed July 26, 2021.
https://scalar.usc.edu/works/the-biological-computer-laboratory/index.
O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown Books.
Reagan, Leslie J. 2017. “Timothy Nugent: ‘Wheelchair Students’ and the Creation of the Most Accessible Campus in the World.” In The University of Illinois: Engine of Innovation, edited by Frederick E. Hoxie. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1m3217b.14.
Scott, Robert. 2011. “Heinz von Foerster’s Heuristics Course: A Factor in the Development of Second-Order Cybernetics in the United States.” Kybernetes 40(7/8): 1149–1158.
https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111160377.
Simon, Roger. 1968. “Students Want Change.” The Daily Illini, March 12, 1968. Illinois Digital Newspaper Collections.
Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist. 43(3): 377–391.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. New York: Beacon Press.
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2011. The Googlization of Everything (And Why We Should Worry). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
⸻. 2018. Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190056544.001.0001.
Von Foerster, Heinz, and Herbert Brün. 1970. Heuristics: A Report on a Course on Knowledge Acquisition. BCL Report 13.1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign IL. October 3, 1970.
Von Foerster, Heinz. 1991. Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics.
https://www.pangaro.com/hciiseminar2019/Heinz_von_Foerster-Ethics_and_Second-order_Cybernetics.pdf.
Williamson, Joy Ann. 2013. Black Power on Campus: The University of Illinois, 1965–75. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
⸻. 2018. “Clarence Shelley: The Campaign to Diversify the University.” In The University of Illinois: Engine of Innovation, edited by Frederick E. Hoxie. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1m3217b.20.
Wisnioski, Matthew. 2012. “Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America.” Journal of American History 100(4):1277–1278.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs Books.
Copyright (c) 2024 Anita Chan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
