Spaceships and Poetry: Enlivening the Lab as a Site of Feminist Critical Pedagogy
Abstract
Whilst STS has long studied lab work, the past few years have also seen the introduction of labs as social formations for doing STS enquiry. But what kind of contributions to pedagogy, particularly in technical universities, can STS inspired university labs make? We respond to the need to more deeply understand how teaching may be practiced as a site of STS experimentation by describing the work of the ETHOS Lab, our critical feminist lab at the IT University of Copenhagen, as ‘enlivening’. Using three events from 2017–2020 as case studies, we identify both the use of space and shaping of time as integral to how we have sought to trouble knowledge production in our own environment, particularly by creating sites and situations where teaching and research cannot be separated. By showing how our Lab activities intervene in ways of knowing and doing within university hierarchies and cultures, we aim to contribute an analysis of the critical potential of STS lab work in technical environments, and recommendations from our situated evolving space of feminist praxis within an interdisciplinary IT University.
References
Data Availability
Data published in these issues can be accessed in STS Infrastructures at: https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4z88b.
References
Albrecht, Jan Phillip. 2016. “How GDPR Will Change the World.” European Data Protection Law Review 2(3): 287–289.
https://doi.org/10.21552/EDPL/2016/3/4.
Atenas, Javiera, Helen Beetham, Frances Bell, Catherine Cronin, et al. 2022. “Feminisms, Technologies and Learning: Continuities and Contestations” Learning, Media and Technology 47(1): 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2041830.
Ballestero, Andrea. 2019. A Future History of Water. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Benjamin, Ruha, ed. 2019. Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and the Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Born, Georgina, and Andrew Barry. 2013. “Art-Science: From Public Understanding to Public Experiment.” In Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, edited by Andrew Barry and Georgina Born, 247–72. London: Routledge.
Borra, Erik, and Bernhard Rieder. 2014. “Programmed Method: Developing a Toolset for Capturing and Analyzing Tweets” Aslib Journal of Information Management 66(3): 262–278.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094.
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butler, Judith. [1990] 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Buttarelli, Giovanni. 2016. “The EU GDPR as a Clarion Call for a New Global Digital Gold Standard.” International Data Privacy Law 6(2): 77–78.
https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw006.
Cohn, David. 2018a. “Video Installation Images.” In GDPR Poems, edited by Rachel Douglas-Jones and Marisa Cohn, Copenhagen: ETHOS Lab.
Cohn, David. 2018b. “Digital Territory/Zero Memory” Video, 4 min, 45 sec.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt. 2013. “Lifetimes and Legacies: Temporalities of Sociotechnical Change in a Long-Lived System.” PhD Dissertation, UC Irvine.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563932
⸻. 2019. “Keeping Software Present: Software as a Timely Object for STS Studies of the Digital.” In digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, edited by Janet Vertesi and David Ribes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt, and Brit Ross Winthereik. 2015. “ETHOS Lab Launch Speech.” Unpublished, IT University of Copenhagen.
Crabtree, Robbin D., David Alan Sapp, and Adela C. Licona. 2009. “Introduction: The Passion and the Praxis of Feminist Pedagogy.” In Feminist Pedagogy: Looking Back to Move Forward, edited by Robbin D. Crabtree, David Alan Sapp, Adela C. Licona, 1–22. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Crawley, Sara, Jennifer E. Lewis, and Maralee Mayberry. 2008. “Introduction—Feminist Pedagogies in Action: Teaching beyond Disciplines.” Feminist Teacher 19(1): 1–12.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40546070.
Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2022. “Can IT Resolve the Climate Crisis? Sketching a Role of an Anthropology of Digital Technology” Sustainability 14(10): 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106109.
Digital Methods Initiative. 2014. Twitter Capture and Analysis Toolset (DMI-TCAT).
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/ToolDmiTcat.
D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Docherty, Calum. 2018. “2016” and “2018” in GDPR Poems, edited by Rachel Douglas-Jones and Marisa Cohn, 6–7. Copenhagen: ETHOS Lab.
Douglas-Jones, Rachel. 2016. “Interview with Rachel Douglas-Jones.” The ETHOS Blog. Published November 9, 2016. Accessed May 18, 2023.
https://ethos.itu.dk/interview-with-rachel-douglas-jones/.
⸻. 2018a. “Introduction.” In GDPR Poems, edited by Rachel Douglas-Jones and Marisa Cohn. Copenhagen: ETHOS Lab.
Douglas-Jones, Rachel, and Marisa Cohn, eds. 2018b. “GDPR Poems.” Copenhagen: ETHOS Lab.
Douglas-Jones, Rachel, and Katrine Meldgaard Kjær. 2020. “PhD Course—Research, Interrupted—Methods and (Re)design of Fieldwork” in Anthropology and STS. PhD Course Curriculum. IT University of Copenhagen: Denmark.
Dourish, Paul, and Edgar Goméz Cruz. 2018. “Datafication and Data Fiction: Narrating Data and Narrating with Data.” Big Data & Society 5(2): 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718784083.
Dourish, Paul, Gillian R. Hayes, Lilly Irani, Charlotte P. Lee, et al. 2008. “Informatics at UC Irvine.” In CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3651–3656. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358907.
European Space Agency (ESA). 2019. The Huygens Probe Lands on Titan. Modified September 1, 2019.
https://sci.esa.int/web/education/-/45751-the-huygens-probe-lands-on-titan.
European Parliament. 2016. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Official Journal of the European Union, Legislative Act 119/1, Brussels. Accessed July 1, 2024.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679.
Freeman, Elisabeth. 2010. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fritsch, Ester. 2021. “Echoes of Ethics across Europe: An Ethnography of Ethical Interventions into the Internet of Things.” PhD Dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gahoonia, Simy Kaur, Pedro Ferreira, Marisa Cohn, Line Henriksen, et al. 2020. “Upon Not Opening The Black Box.” In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–9. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381813.
Goddard, Michelle. 2017. “The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): European Regulation that has a Global Impact” International Journal of Market Research 59(6): 703–705.
https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-050.
Gould, Hannah, Michael Arnold, Tamara Kohn, Bjørn Nansen, et al. 2021. “Robot Death Care: A Study of Funerary Practice.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 24(4): 603–621.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920939093.
Gugganig, Mascha, and Rachel Douglas-Jones. 2021. “Visual Vignettes.” In Sensing In/Security: Sensors as Transnational Security Infrastructure, edited by Nina Klimburg-Witjes, Nicholas Poechhacker, and Geoffrey C. Bowker, 215–236. Manchester: Mattering Press.
http://doi.org/10.28938/9781912729111.
Haraway, Donna. 2010. “When Species Meet: Staying with the Trouble.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(1): 53–55.
https://doi.org/10.1068/d2706wsh.
⸻. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
⸻. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York: Routledge.
Howe, Sarah. 2014. “A Note about ‘Two Systems’” Law Text Culture 18: 249–257.
IT University of Copenhagen. 2019. “The Story of ITU.” IT University of Copenhagen. Accessed January 29, 2022.
https://en.itu.dk/about-itu/the-story-of-itu.
Jungnickel, Kat. 2020. “Introduction” In Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research, edited by Kat Jungnickel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jutel, Olivier. 2021. “Blockchain Imperialism in the Pacific.” Big Data & Society 8(1): 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720985249.
Karran, Terence. 2004. “Achieving Bologna Convergence: Is ECTS Failing to Make the Grade?” Higher Education in Europe 29(3): 411–421.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772042000331688.
Kempson, Michelle. 2015. “‘My Version of Feminism’: Subjectivity, DIY and the Feminist Zine” Social Movement Studies 14(4): 459–472.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.945157.
Larkin, Brian. 2013. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42:327–343.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lehuedé, Sebastián. 2022. “Territories of Data: Ontological Divergences in the Growth of Data Infrastructures.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 5(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2035936.
López, Iván Chaar. 2022. “Latina/o/e Technoscience: Labor, Race and Gender in Cybernetics and Computing.” Social Studies of Science 52(6): 829–852.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221108515.
University of California Irvine, Department of Informatics. 2021. “Labs & Centers.” Website page. Accessed February 5, 2022.
https://www.informatics.uci.edu/research/labs-centers/.
Maguire, James, and Brit Ross Winthereik. 2019. “Digitalizing the State: Data Centres and the Power of Exchange.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 86(3): 530–551.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2019.1660391.
Metcalf, Jacob, Emanuel Moss, and danah boyd. 2019. “Owning Ethics: Corporate Logics, Silicon Valley, and the Institutionalization of Ethics.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 86(2): 449–476.
https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0022.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 2017. “NASA Mission Control Live: Cassini’s Finale at Saturn.” Streamed live on Youtube on September 15, 2017. Accessed February 5, 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5Ho30EMRm4.
⸻. 2019. “Cassini: The Grand Finale.” NASA Missions. Accessed February 5, 2022.
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/cassini/mission/grand-finale/overview/.
Landa, Luis. 2022. “A DIY Solar Server and the Challenges and Provocations of Attempting to Decarbonise Our Lab’s Website.” In NordiCHI ’22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, 1. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3547292.
Laursen, Cæcilie. 2017. “What Is a Data Sprint?” The ETHOS blog. February 15, 2017. Accessed August 13, 2022.
https://ethos.itu.dk/caecilie-laursen/.
Madsen, Mette My, Anders Blok, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2018. “Transversal Collaboration: An Ethnography in/of Computational Social Science.” In Ethnography for a Data-Saturated World, edited by Hannah Knox and Dawn Nafus. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Nelson, Alondra. 2020. “Society After Pandemic.” Social Science Research Council (SSRC): Insights from the Social Sciences. Blog. April 23, 2020. Accessed August 13, 2022.
https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/society-after-pandemic/.
Ojala, Mace, Pedro Ferreira, and Merethe Riggelsen Gjørding. 2022. “Feminist Ethos under Data Production Pressures.” Paper presented at the EASST Conference “Politics of Technoscientific Futures” in Madrid, June 6–9, 2022.
Omolade, Barbara. 1987. “A Black Feminist Pedagogy.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 15(3/4): 32–39.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40003434.
Ortmann, Cecilia. 2022. “Hacking the Learning: Possible Pathways for a Feminist Pedagogy of Free Software in Activist Experiences in Argentina.” Learning, Media and Technology 47(1): 26–38.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2031213.
Parikka, Jussi. 2016. “The Lab as a Symptom.” Machinology. Blog. May 10, 2016. Accessed January 15, 2022.
https://jussiparikka.net/2016/05/10/the-lab-as-a-symptom/.
Pawlicka-Deger, Urszula. 2020. “The Laboratory Turn: Exploring Discourses, Landscapes, and Models of Humanities Labs.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 14(3): 1–22.
https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/3/000466/000466.html.
Pink, Sarah. 2022. “The Gender of Smart Charging.” Buildings & Cities 3(1): 488–502.
https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.212.
Poggiali, Lisa. 2016. “Seeing (from) Digital Peripheries: Technology and Transparency in Kenya’s Silicon Savannah.” Cultural Anthropology 31(3): 387–411.
https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.07.
Pollari, Niina. 2017. “Form N-400 Erasures.” Tyrant Books February 23.
http://magazine.nytyrant.com/form-n-400-erasures/.
Reardon, Jenny, Jacob Metcalf, Martha Kenney, and Karen Barad. 2015. “Science & Justice: The Trouble and the Promise.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 1(1): 1–48.
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v1i1.28817.
Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital Methods: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001.
Rowlands, Julie, and Susan Wright. 2019. “Hunting for Points: The Effects of Research Assessment on Research Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 46(9): 1801–1815.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1706077.
Shklovski, Irina, Scott D. Mainwaring, Halla Hrund Skúladóttir, and Höskuldur Borgthorsson. 2014. “Leakiness and Creepiness in App Space: Perceptions of Privacy and Mobile App Use.” In CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), 2347–2356. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557421.
Schou, Jannick, and Morten Hjelholt. 2017. “Digital Lifestyles Between Solidarity, Discipline and Neoliberalism: On the Historical Transformations of the Danish IT Political Field from 1994 to 2016.” TripleC 15(1): 370–389.
https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i1.844.
Schou, Jannick, and Anja Svejgaard Pors. 2019. “Digital by Default? A Qualitative Study of Exclusion in Digitalised Welfare.” Social Policy & Administration 53(3): 464–477.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470.
Seberger, John S., Irina Shklovski, Emily Swiatek, and Sameer Patil. 2022. “Still Creepy After All These Years: The Normalization of Affective Discomfort in App Use.” In CHI ’22:Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, 1–19. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502112.
Spivak, Gayatri C. [1993] 2009. Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledge.
Stone, Melissa, Nupoor Ranade, and Missy F. Hannah. 2020. “DIY Feminist Pedagogies: Making Feminist Practices More Apparent in Technical Rhetorics Classrooms.” MAI Feminism & Visual Culture. Blog. January 27, 2020. Accessed August 13, 2022.
Techfestival. 2020. “Techfestival.” Archive. Accessed May 13, 2023.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201029183654/https://techfestival.co/.
Thumel, Alison. 2017. “Sunday Rumpus Poetry: Six Erasure Poems by Alison Thumel.” The Rumpus. March 26, 2017. Accessed May 13, 2023.
https://therumpus.net/2017/03/the-sunday-rumpus-julia-hahnbreitbart-erasure-poems-by-alison-thumel/.
Uddannelses of Forskningsministeriet [Ministry of Higher Education Science]. 2021. “A New Political Agreement Limits SU Spending on Foreign Students from the EU. Newsroom. July 5, 2021. Accessed September 13, 2022.
Venturini, Tommaso. 2010. “Diving in Magma: How to Explore Controversies with Actor-Network Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 19(3): 258–273.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102694.
Venturini, Tommaso, and Bruno Latour. 2010.“The Social Fabric: Digital Traces and Quali-Quantitative Methods.” Proceedings of Future En Seine. Accessed September 13, 2022.
http://www.tommasoventurini.it/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/TheSocialFabric.pdf.
Vertesi, Janet. 2015. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vora, Kalindi, Sarah McCullough, and Sara Giordano. 2022. “Asking Different Questions in STEM Research: Feminist STS Approaches to STEM Pedagogy” ADVANCE Journal 3(1): 1–38.
https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/ADVJRNL.3.1.10.
Wershler, Darren, Lori Emerson, and Jussi Parikka. 2022. The Lab Book: Situated Practices in Media Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wright, Susan. 2017. “Can the University Be a Livable Institution in the Anthropocene?” In The University as a Critical Institution? Edited by Rosemary Deem and Heather Eggins, 17–37. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-116-2_2.
⸻. 2021. “European Science and Higher Education Visions and Critical Assessment.” Working Paper Series No. 35. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.
https://dpu.au.dk/fileadmin/edu/Forskning/EPOKE/Working_paper_35_4_.pdf.
Wright, Susan, and Jakob Williams Ørberg. 2011. “The Double Shuffle of University Reform – The OECD/Denmark Policy Interface.” In Academic Identities – Academic Challenges? American and European Experience of the Transformation of Higher Education and Research, edited by Atle Nyhagen and Tor Halvorsen, 269–294. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Press.
⸻. 2015. “Autonomy and Control: Danish University Reform in the Context of Modern Governance.” In Learning under Neoliberalism: Ethnographies of Governance in Higher Education, edited by Susan Brin Hyatt, Boone W. Shear, and Susan Wright. Oxford: Berghahn.
⸻. 2017. “Universities in the Competition State: Lessons from Denmark.” In Death of the Public University? Uncertain Futures for Higher Education in the Knowledge Economy, edited by Susan Wright and Cris Shore. New York: Berghahn.
York, Emily, and Shannon Conley. 2019. “Critical Imagination at the Intersection of STS Pedagogy and Research.” Platypus: CASTAC Blog. November 5, 2019. Accessed August 23, 2022.
⸻. 2019. “STS as Critical Pedagogy NSF Proposal Project Description.” STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). Modified August 13, 2019. Accessed September 13, 2022.
https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/sts-critical-pedagogy-nsf-proposal-project-description.
York, Emily, Shannon N. Conley, and Samuel Kodua. 2019. “The STS Futures Lab at James Madison University: Integrating Design Fiction, Experimental Pedagogy, and Anticipatory Research into STEM Education and Outreach.” In Stronger Together: Making STEAM Partnerships, edited by Gillian Judson and Jailson Lima. CIRCE Magazine. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
York, Emily, and Angela Okune. 2024. “Collaborative Formations at the Intersection of Pedagogy, Engagement, and Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 88–102.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rachel Douglas-Jones, Baki Cakici, Marisa Leavitt Cohn, Simy Kaur Gahoonia, Mace Ojala, Cæcilie Sloth Laursen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.