Provocations from the ‘STS as a Critical Pedagogy’ Workshop

  • Shannon N. Conley
  • Emily York
  • Eleanor S. Armstrong
  • Marisa Brandt
  • Anita Chan
  • Martin Perez Comisso
  • Shelby Dietz
  • Rachel Douglas-Jones
  • Max Etka
  • Courtney Forberg
  • Anna Geltzer
  • Monamie Haines
  • Nolan Harrington
  • Matthew Harsh
  • Alexa Houck
  • Eric Kennedy
  • Ali Kenner
  • Crystal Lee
  • James Malazita
  • Nicole Mogul
  • Sharlissa Moore
  • Cora Olson
  • Elizabeth Reddy
  • Kathleen Sheppard
  • Ashley Shew
  • Ranjit Singh
  • sam smiley
  • Lindsay Smith
  • Ellan Spero
  • David Tomblin
  • Danica Tran
  • Raquel Velho
  • Andrew Webb
  • Aubreyn Wigner
  • Damien Williams
  • Matthew Wisnioski
  • Hong-An Wu
  • Kari Zacharias
  • Malte Ziewitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927

Abstract

This research article is a collaborative set of reflections and provocations stemming from the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded workshop on STS as a Critical Pedagogy, hosted online during the summer of 2021 by Shannon N. Conley and Emily York at James Madison University. The workshop occurred over four separate sessions, bringing together forty participants (including six undergraduate students who contributed as both facilitators and research assistants). Participants self-organized into panels, leading the workshop collective to engage a host of questions, challenges, methods, and practices related to STS and critical pedagogy. Questions included the following. What characterizes critical STS pedagogies? How are critical STS pedagogies enabled and constrained by our institutional and disciplinary locations? What makes STS pedagogies travel? How might we imagine STS pedagogies otherwise? How do our pedagogies shape our research and engagement in the world? How might we critically interrogate the boundaries between research, teaching, service, and engagement, and what becomes visible when we do so?

References

Data Availability

Data published in this manuscript can be accessed in STS Infrastructures at: https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4302j.

References

Amrute, Sareeta, Ranjit Singh, and Rigoberto Lara Guzmán. 2022. A Primer on AI in/from the Majority World: An Empirical Site and a Standpoint. New York: Data & Society Research Institute.

https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4199467.

Armstrong, Eleanor. 2021. Re-Imagining Display: Object-Oriented Exploration of Invisibilised Knowledge. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 16, 2021, accessed October 7, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4tg7s.

Armstrong, Eleanor, Shelby Dietz, Sharlissa Moore, Ellan Spero, et al. 2021. Making the Invisible Visible Group Presentation Slides. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 16, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4530f.

⸻. 2024. “Making the Invisible Visible.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 12–13.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Barad, Karen. 2000. “Reconceiving Scientific Literacy as Agential Literacy: Or. Learning How to Intra-Act Responsibly within the World.” In Doing Science + Culture, edited by Roddey Reid and Sharon Traweek, 221–258. New York: Routledge.

⸻. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Beddoes, Kacey D. 2012. “Feminist Scholarship in Engineering Education: Challenges and Tensions.” Engineering Studies 4(3): 205–32.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2012.693932.

Bernstein, Michael J., Kiera Reifschneider, Ira Bennett, and Jameson M. Wetmore. 2017. “Science Outside the Lab: Helping Graduate Students in Science and Engineering Understand the Complexities of Science Policy.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23(3):861-882.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9818-6.

Boal, Augusto. 2002. Games for Actors and Non-Actors. Translated by Adrian Jackson. Second Edition. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994818.

⸻. 2006. The Aesthetics of the Oppressed. Translated by Adrian Jackson. London: Routledge.

Boudreau, Kristin. 2015. “To See the World Anew: Learning Engineering through a Humanistic Lens.” Engineering Studies 7(2–3): 206–8.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2015.1062506.

Bozalek, Vivienne, Rosi Braidotti, Tamara Shefer, and Michalinos Zembylas, eds. 2018. Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education. ProQuest Ebook Central Leased. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Brandt, Marisa. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Marisa Brandt. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4sw2q.

Brandt, Marisa, Sean Ferguson, Anna Geltzer, Kathleen Sheppard, et al. 2021a. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Opening Remarks. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p42c7x.

⸻. 2021b. Making the Case for Ourselves: Boundary Objects in Critical STS Pedagogies Slides June 23, 2021. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed August 10, 2021.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4xk50.

⸻. 2024. “Making the Case for Ourselves: Boundary Objects in Critical STS Pedagogies Slides.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 113–4.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Brandt, Marisa, and Megan Halpern. 2021. “Collaborative Research: RUI: Collaborative Research and Education Architecture for Transformative Engagement with STS (CREATE/STS),” U.S. National Science Foundation Award, #2121214. July 26, 2021, last modified August 30, 2023, accessed June 4, 2024.

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2121214&HistoricalAwards=false.

Cech, Erin A. 2014. “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?” Science Technology, & Human Values 39(1): 42–72.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305.

Chan, Anita Say, Rachel Douglas-Jones, Ranjit Singh, and Malte Ziewitz. 2021a. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Labs and Clinics—Part I Spaces. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 3, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4rw2d.

⸻. 2021b. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Labs and Clinics—Part II Institutions. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 3, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4n30s.

⸻. 2021c. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Labs and Clinics—Part III Politics. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 3, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4hc7z.

⸻. 2021d. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Labs and Clinics—Part IV Objects. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 3, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4cp4p.

⸻. 2021e. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Labs and Clinics—Part V Students. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 3, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p47w2r.

⸻. 2022. Laboratory Life Redux: STS Labs and Clinics Bundle. Bundle. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography). September 30, 2022, last modified October 6, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4ps34.

⸻. 2024. “Laboratory Life Redux: STS Labs and Clinics.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 115–16.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes, eds. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. New York: Routledge.

Clarke, Adele E., Rachel Washburn, and Carrie Friese. eds. 2015. Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315420134.

CLEAR. 2021. CLEAR Lab Book: A Living Manual of our Values, Guidelines, and Protocols. Version 3. Public Version. Updated Summer 2021. St. John’s, NL: Civic Laboratory for Environmental Action Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5450517.

Comisso, Martin Pérez. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Interrogating STS Pedagogies—Part IV Martin Pérez Comisso Presentation and Discussion. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 6, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4m59k.

Comisso, Martin Andrés Pérez, Eric Kennedy, James Malazita, Raquel Velho, et al. 2024. “Interrogating STS Pedagogies.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 116–7.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Community Data Clinic. 2022. Community Data Clinic. Website URL. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified October 4, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4k305.

Conley, Shannon N., and Emily York. 2021. “Collaborative Research: RUI: Collaborative Research and Education Architecture for Transformative Engagement with STS (CREATE/STS),” U.S. National Science Foundation Award, #2121207. July 26, 2021, accessed June 5, 2024.

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2121207&HistoricalAwards=false.

⸻. [2021] 2024. STS as a Critical Pedagogy Workshop NSF Award. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified April 5, 2024, accessed June 5, 2024.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4n014.

Crabtree, Robbin D., David Alan Sapp, and Adela C. Licona. 2009. “Introduction: The Passion and the Praxis of Feminist Pedagogy.” In Feminist Pedagogy: Looking Back to Move Forward, 1–20. A National Women’s Studies Association Journal Reader. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Data & Society. N.d. Research and Policy for the Public Interest (website). Accessed August 19, 2024.

https://datasociety.net/.

Dietz, Shelby. 2021. Harnessing Interdisciplinary Groups to Articulate Fundamental Assumptions and Perspectives. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 11, 2021, accessed October 7, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4401g.

Digital Due Process Clinic. 2023. “Digital Due Process Clinic: A Clinical Research Program.” Website of the Cornell University, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Ithaca, New York. Accessed 24 July 2023.

https://dueprocess.sts.cornell.edu/.

Downey, Gary L. 2015. “Engineering Studies.” International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences 7: 641–48.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85050-3.

Downey, Gary Lee, and Kacey Beddoes. 2011. What Is Global Engineering Education For? The Making of International Educators, Part I. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Downey, Gary Lee, and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak. 2017. “Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 223–51. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

⸻, eds. 2021. Making & Doing: Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Ethos Lab. N.d. Feminist STS lab at IT University of Copenhagen (website). Accessed August 19, 2024.

https://ethos.itu.dk/.

Ethos Lab, and Simy Kaur Gahoonia. 2018. Great Deletion Poetry Rave Poster. Image. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 30, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4p01f.

Etka, Maxwell, Courtney Forberg, Nolan Harrington, Alexa Houck, et al. 2024. “An Undergraduate Perspective.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 118–9.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Ferguson, Sean. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Sean Ferguson. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4p303.

Felt, Ulrike, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 2017. “Introduction.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Fisher, Erik, and Daan Schuurbiers. 2013. “Socio-Technical Integration Research: Collaborative Inquiry at the Midstream of Research and Development.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo van de Poel, and Michael E. Gorman, 97–110. Dordrecht: Springer.

Freire, Paulo. [1970] 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum.

Geltzer, Anna. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Anna Geltzer. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4dk5b.

Giordano, Sara. 2017. “Those Who Can’t, Teach: Critical Science Literacy as a Queer Science of Failure.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 3(1): 1–21.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28790.

Haines, Monamie Bhadra. 2019. “Contested Credibility Economies of Nuclear Power in India.” Social Studies of Science 49(1): 29–51.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719827114.

⸻. 2020. “Chinese Privilege”: Teaching Race and Technology in Singapore. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified July 29, 2020, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4fk5n.

⸻. 2021a. Screwing Up and Sticking with It in Singapore (Slides)—Monamie Bhadra Haines. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 6, 2021, accessed August 10, 2021.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4088n.

⸻. 2021b. “Design a Feminist Technology” Final Project HS2020. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified October 6, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p49w2c.

Haines, Monamie Bhadra, Elizabeth Reddy, sam smiley, and Lindsay Smith. 2024. “We are Screwing Up and Sticking with It.” Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1–2): 110–3–XX.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

Haines, Monamie Bhadra, and Sreela Sarkar. 2020. “Sticks, Stones, and the Secular Bones of Indian Democracy.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6: 133–141.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.393.

Hamlin, Darrell A. 2019. “Engaged Research Pedagogy and Partnership Introduction.” EJournal of Public Affairs 8(2): 1–4.

https://doi.org/10.21768/ejopa.v8i2.1.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

Harsh, Matthew, Nicole Mogul, David Tomblin, Damien Williams, et al. 2021. Cooking with STS: Lived Experience as Ingredients. Multi-part. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 6, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4h889.

⸻. 2024. Cooking with STS: Lived Experiences as Ingredients. Sub-section. STS and Critical Pedagogy Provocations from an NSF-funded Workshop, by Shannon N. Conley, et al., Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 10(1): 117–8.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.1927.

hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.

⸻. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York: Routledge.

John, Kimberly, Matthew R. Harsh, and Eric B. Kennedy. 2019. “Science Outside the Lab (North): A Science and Public Policy Immersion Program in Canada.” In Developing Change Agents: Innovative Practices for Sustainability Leadership, edited by Kristi L. Kremers, Alexander S. Liepins, and Abigail M. York, 46–58. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing.

Joyce, Kelly Ann, Kendall Darfler, Dalton George, Jason Ludwig, et al. 2018. “Engaging STEM Ethics Education.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.221.

Kennedy, Eric. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Interrogating STS Pedagogies—Part III Eric Kennedy Presentation and Discussion. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 5, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4qw23.

Kenner, Ali. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Concluding Remarks and Activity with Ali Kenner. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 6, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4zc70.

Kenny, Catherine, Max Liboiron, and Sara Ann Wylie. 2019. “Seeing Power with a Flashlight: DIY Thermal Sensing Technology in the Classroom.” Social Studies of Science 49(1): 3–28.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718823282.

Khandekar, Aalok, Duygu Kasdogan, Noela Invernizzi, Kim Fortun, and Angela Okune. 2020. Open Panel, 4S/EASST 2020—Transnational STS: Theories, Practices, and Pedagogies. Multi-part. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 13, 2020, accessed October 7, 2022.

https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/open-panel-4seasst-2020-transnational-sts-theories-practices-and-pedagogies.

Lasker, Grace A., and Nancy J. Simcox. 2020. “Using Feminist Theory and Social Justice Pedagogy to Educate a New Generation of Precautionary Principal Chemists.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(1): 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i1.32084.

Law, John. 2017. “STS as Method.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 31–57. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lee, Crystal, Cora Olson, and Ashley Shew. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—STS Teaching and Thinking with Disabilities Part I. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 30, 2022, accessed August 10, 2021.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4zk59.

Lehr, Jane L. 2015. “Co-Creating Liberal Studies in Engineering Program(s): A Perspective from Ethnic Studies, Women’s & Gender Studies, and Science & Technology Studies.” Engineering Studies 7(2–3): 123–25.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2015.1062502.

Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lezaun, Javier, Noortje Marres, and Manuel Tironi. 2017. “Experiments in Participation.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 195–221. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Luke, Carmen, and Jennifer Gore, eds. 1992. Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

Mogul, Nicole. 2021. Recipes are Lived Experiences. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified July 30, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4359x.

Moore, Sharlissa, and Aubrey Wigner. 2021. Photo Elicitation for Exploring Complex Systems. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 11, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4wk5p.

Nieusma, Dean, and James W. Malazita. 2016. “‘Making’ a Bridge: Critical Making as Synthesized Engineering/Humanistic Inquiry.” Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.

https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26234.

Ottinger, Gwen, Javiera Barandiarán, and Aya H. Kimura. 2017. “Environmental Justice: Knowledge, Technology, and Expertise.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 1029–57. Fourth Edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Park, Shelley M. 1996. “Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn’t Women’s Work Count?” The Journal of Higher Education 67(1): 46–84.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780249.

Parreñas, Juno Salazar. 2018. Decolonizing Extinction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation. Book Series Experimental Futures: Technological Lives, Scientific Arts, Anthropological Voices. Durham: Duke University Press.

Pickering, Andrew. [1993] 1999. “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science (1993).” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli, 372–393. New York: Routledge.

Reardon, Jenny, Jacob Metcalf, Martha Kenney, and Karen Barad. 2015. “Science & Justice: The Trouble and the Promise.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 1(1): 1–49.

https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v1i1.28817.

Reddy, Elizabeth, and Marie Stettler Kleine. 2021. “Collaborative Research: RUI: Collaborative Research and Education Architecture for Transformative Engagement with STS (CREATE/STS),” U.S. National Science Foundation Award, #2121224. July 26, 2021, last modified April 21, 2022, accessed June 4, 2024.

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2121224&HistoricalAwards=false.

Reddy, Elizabeth, and Shannon Davies Mancus. 2021. Social, Technical . . . and Environmental?: Addressing Environmental Entanglements as a Part of Engineering Education. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 7, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4k88x.

Riley, Donna. 2003. “Employing Liberative Pedagogies in Engineering Education.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 9(2): 137–58.

https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i2.20.

Riley, Donna, Alice L. Pawley, Jessica Tucker, and George D. Catalano. 2009. “Feminisms in Engineering Education: Transformative Possibilities.” NWSA Journal 21(2): 21–40.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20628172.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.

Sheppard, Kathleen. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Kate Sheppard. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 1, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4jc78.

Shew, Ashley. 2020. “Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 39(1): 40–85.

https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2020.2967492.

Shor, Ira. 2012. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Singh, Ranjit, Rigoberto Lara Guzmán, and Patrick Davison, eds. 2022. Parables of AI in/from the Majority World. New York: Data & Society Research Institute.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4258527.

Slaton, Amy E., Erin A. Cech, and Donna M. Riley. 2019. “Yearning, Learning, and Earning: The Gritty Ontologies of American Engineering Education.” In STEM of Desire: Queer Theories and Science Education, edited by William J. Letts and Steve Fifield, 319–40. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education Book Series. Leiden: Brill.

smiley, sam. 2021. We Are All Screwing Up and Sticking with It Word Cloud Bundle. Image. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 30, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4cg6c.

Smith, Lindsay, Martin Pérez Comisso, Octavio Mucino, and Mary Jane Parmentier. 2019. Slides-CACHO: Symmetrical Co-design for COIL. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 10, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4q30d.

Spero, Ellan, and Christine Ortiz. 2021. Navigating Dimensions across Materials and History: Scale as a Lens to Understand Dynamic and Cumulative Sociotechnical Relationships. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 7, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p41c7m.

Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.

https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.

Stromquist, Nelly P. 2017. “The Professoriate: The Challenged Subject in US Higher Education.” Comparative Education 53(1): 132–46.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1254975.

STS as a Critical Pedagogy Workshop Participants. 2021a. STS as a Critical Pedagogy Workshop Program. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified September 30, 2022, accessed August 8, 2021.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4388k.

⸻. 2021b. STS Iron Chef. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified October 6, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p46w2f.

Tironi, Manuel. 2014. “Atmospheres of Indagation: Disasters and the Politics of Excessiveness.” The Sociological Review 62(1): 114–134.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12126.

Tomblin, David, and Nicole Mogul. 2020. “STS Postures: Responsible Innovation and Research in Undergraduate STEM Education.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 117–27.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1839230.

⸻. 2021. “Collaborative Research: RUI: Collaborative Research and Education Architecture for Transformative Engagement with STS (CREATE/STS),” U.S. National Science Foundation Award, #2121266. July 26, 2021, accessed June 4, 2024.

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2121266&HistoricalAwards=false.

Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Velho, Raquel, and James Malazita. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Interrogating STS Pedagogies—Part I. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 4, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p40c79.

Velho, Rachel, James Malazita, Matt Wisnioski, Eric Kennedy and Martín Andrés Pérez Comisso. 2021a. Interrogating STS Pedagogies Panel Abstract. Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 5, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p44597.

⸻. 2021b. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Interrogating STS Pedagogies—Concluding Discussion. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 6, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4gc7n.

⸻. Velho, Rachel, James Malazita, Matt Wisnioski, Eric Kennedy and Martín Andrés Pérez Comisso. 2021c. Interrogating STS Pedagogies. Multi-part. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified October 10, 2022, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p47s33.

Weise, Jillian. 2020. “Common Cyborg.” In Disability Visibility: First–Person Stories from the Twenty-First Century, edited by Alice Wong, 63–74. New York: Vintage Books.

Wisnioski, Matthew. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Interrogating STS Pedagogies—Part II Matt Wisnioski Presentation and Discussion. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 4, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4vp41.

Wu, Ann, Damien Williams, Nicole Mogul, Matthew Harsh, et al. 2021. Cooking with STS (Intro Slides). Text. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified July 30, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4bp4c.

York, Emily. 2018. “Doing STS in STEM Spaces: Experiments in Critical Participation.” Engineering Studies 10(1): 66–84.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2018.1447576.

York, Emily, and Shannon Conley. 2019a. The STS Futures Lab at the Intersection of Research and Pedagogy. Multi-part. In Innovating STS Digital Exhibit, curated by Aalok Khandekar, and Kim Fortun. Society for Social Studies of Science. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified 31 August 2019, accessed 14 November 2024.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p4x881.

⸻. 2019b. “Critical Imagination at the Intersection of STS Pedagogy and Research.” Blog post. Platypus: The CASTAC Blog. November 5, 2019. Accessed November 14, 2024.

http://blog.castac.org/2019/11/critical-imagination-at-the-intersection-of-sts-pedagogy-and-research/.

Zacharias, Kari. 2021. STS Critical Pedagogies Workshop—Making the Case for Ourselves—Kari Zacharias. Video. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. STS Infrastructures (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography), last modified August 2, 2021, accessed October 6, 2022.

https://n2t.net/ark:/81416/p48w22.

Published
01 Dec 2024
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 1–2 (2024)
Section
Thematic Collection: Pedagogical Intersections

Copyright (c) 2024 Emily York, Shannon Conley

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors of all content published in ESTS retain the copyright to their work and are responsible for choosing the appropriate license from the licenses supported by the journal: CC BY 4.0 CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 4.0, or CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Please refer to the footer of the full text to learn about the specific license applied to each piece.